John Millman vs Tatsuma Ito — Kyoto CH Semi-final

Kyoto CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
AUS4
John Millman
37 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 23 February 2015
hard
JPN2
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Millman J.
6-3 7-5
Ito T.
Millman J.
672
Ito T.
350

John Millman defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-3 7-5 in the Kyoto CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — John Millman came in leading the head-to-head 2–1. John Millman extended the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: John Millman closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

2–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-09-30TokyoQ2hardJohn Millman7-6(5) 6-1
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardTatsuma Ito6-4 6-4 3-6 0-6 7-5
2012-12-30BrisbaneR32hardJohn Millman6-4 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Millman J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Millman J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Millman J.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
62%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.7
3.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Millman J.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
24
Break points saved·Dominant
95
61
Break points won·Dominant
64
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
70
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Przysiezny M.[7]
Millman J.[4]
6-33-66-3
Semi-finals
Przysiezny M.[7]
Kapas A.
7-656-4
Millman J.[4]
Ito T.[2]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Millman J.[4]
Kondo H.
W/O
Ito T.[2]
Moriya H.[5]
6-46-2
Przysiezny M.[7]
Soeda G.[1]
6-46-2
Kapas A.
Uchiyama Y.
4-67-687-5
R16
Soeda G.[1]
Li Z.
7-626-3
Przysiezny M.[7]
Thompson J.
6-13-66-3
Uchiyama Y.
Sugita Y.[3]
7-631-66-3
Kapas A.
Zhang Z.[6]
6-37-66
Kondo H.
Mitchell B.[8]
6-46-4
Millman J.[4]
Niki T.
6-34-66-2
Moriya H.[5]
Saito T.
4-67-666-3
Ito T.[2]
Kibi Y.
7-56-4
R32
Sugita Y.[3]
Matsui T.
6-47-63
Moriya H.[5]
Ebden M.
6-37-65
Li Z.
Kim C.
7-636-1
Kondo H.
Okamura I.
6-16-3
Ito T.[2]
Venus M.
7-636-3
Kapas A.
Watanuki Y.
6-36-4
Soeda G.[1]
Onozawa A.
6-16-3
Thompson J.
Zaitsev A.
6-46-2
Przysiezny M.[7]
Ito Y.
6-36-4
Uchiyama Y.
Suzuki T.
6-26-2
Zhang Z.[6]
Singh K.
6-36-4
Mitchell B.[8]
Huang L.
6-46-3
Niki T.
Sekiguchi S.
6-37-69
Millman J.[4]
Ehara H.
6-746-17-5
Saito T.
Takeuchi K.
6-36-2
Kibi Y.
Whittington A.
6-37-65