Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Filippo Volandri — Rio de Janeiro Qualifying Round 2
Rio de Janeiro · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2015
clay
Gimeno Traver D.7-6 6-4
Volandri F.
Gimeno Traver D.
7762
Volandri F.
6440
Daniel Gimeno Traver defeated Filippo Volandri 7-6 6-4 in the Rio de Janeiro qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Filippo Volandri came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Daniel Gimeno Traver claimed a first win over Filippo Volandri in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.
Key context
- Match story: Daniel Gimeno Traver edged Filippo Volandri in two tight sets (7–6 6–4).
Head to head
0–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-02-11 | Sao Paulo | R32 | clay | Filippo Volandri | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) |
| 2006-07-31 | Sopot | R32 | clay | Filippo Volandri | 6-4 6-1 |
Serve vs return
This seasonBaseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
70%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
58%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Even
57%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
0.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.5
1.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 87). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
15
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
50
39
Break points won·Clear edge
30
49
Deciding sets·Clear edge
24
36
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
20
32
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Weather
29°CDrizzle
Wind 3 km/hHumidity 69%
Q2
Cecchinato M.[6]
De Paula F.
4-67-627-65
Gimeno Traver D.[1]
Volandri F.
7-646-4
Arguello F.[4]
Lindell C.
6-16-3
De Bakker T.[3]
Ungur A.[5]
6-36-4