Marinko Matosevic vs John IsnerDelray Beach Round of 32

Delray Beach · ATP · Round of 32
40 yrs · 194 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 16 February 2015
hard
41 yrs · 208 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWLLWWW
Matosevic M.
6-4 6-4
Isner J.
Matosevic M.
662
Isner J.
440

Marinko Matosevic defeated John Isner 6-4 6-4 in the Delray Beach round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — John Isner came in leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's semi-final, but Marinko Matosevic had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on hard. Marinko Matosevic claimed a first win over John Isner in four meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 3–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Marinko Matosevic edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

03
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-08-10Cincinnati MastersR32hardJohn Isner6-3 7-6(1)
2014-07-21AtlantaQFhardJohn Isner7-6(8) 6-4
2014-05-04Madrid MastersR32clayJohn Isner7-6(9) 6-7(5) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Matosevic M.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Isner J.

Isner J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Matosevic M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
80%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
56%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
73%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
29%
Break points saved·Slight edge
60%
70%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.0
21.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (160 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
39
64
Break points saved·Clear edge
81
99
Break points won·Dominant
35
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
53
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
18
98

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast