Luca Vanni vs Daniel Gimeno Traver — Sao Paulo Qualifying Final

Sao Paulo · ATP · Qualifying Final
ITA6
Luca Vanni
41 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
ESP2
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Vanni L.
6-4 6-4
Gimeno Traver D.
Vanni L.
662
Gimeno Traver D.
440

Luca Vanni defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 6-4 6-4 in the Sao Paulo qualifying final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Daniel Gimeno Traver came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Luca Vanni claimed a first win over Daniel Gimeno Traver in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Luca Vanni edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayDaniel Gimeno Traver6-4 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Vanni L.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Vanni L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Vanni L.Gimeno Traver D.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
36%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.3
2.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.7
4.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Vanni L.Gimeno Traver D.
Clutch Rating·Even
17
15
Break points saved·Dominant
81
50
Break points won·Dominant
2
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
24
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Ghem A.
6-41-66-3
Pella G.
Ungur A.[7]
6-33-66-2
De Bakker T.[5]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-16-4
Vanni L.[6]
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4
Q2
De Bakker T.[5]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Ungur A.[7]
Lindell C.
6-46-4
Ghem A.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[4]
Neis F.
6-36-4
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
7-52-0
Pella G.
Haider Maurer A.[1]
6-14-67-64
Vanni L.[6]
Dutra Silva R.
6-26-4
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Lopes T.
6-16-766-3
Q1
Lopes T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Vanni L.[6]
Tsuchiya A.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Sorgi J.
6-06-1
Dutra Silva R.
Cuevas M.
6-44-66-1
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
3-66-27-61
Pella G.
Collarini A.
5-76-16-4
Ungur A.[7]
Severino C.
7-57-5
De Bakker T.[5]
Volandri F.
6-16-2
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-17-5
Lapentti G.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Romboli F.
6-46-4
Neis F.
Miele A.
6-16-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Silva C.
6-26-0
Ghem A.
Cunha H.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[8]
Zampieri C.
6-746-46-4