Leonardo Mayer vs Albert Ramos — Sao Paulo Round of 16

Sao Paulo · ATP · Round of 16
ARG4
Leonardo Mayer
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Mayer L.
6-4 3-6 6-1
Ramos A.
Mayer L.
6362
Ramos A.
4611

Leonardo Mayer defeated Albert Ramos 6-4 3-6 6-1 in the Sao Paulo round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 5–3, defending last year's round of 16. Leonardo Mayer narrowed the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Leonardo Mayer came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–4 3–6 6–1.

Head to head

3–5
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-02-10Buenos AiresR32clayAlbert Ramos4-6 6-3 7-5
2018-07-23HamburgR32clayLeonardo Mayer6-3 6-2
2017-07-24HamburgR32clayLeonardo Mayer6-7(3) 6-3 7-6(4)
2017-02-13Buenos AiresR16clayAlbert Ramos6-7(4) 7-6(3) 1-0 RET
2014-02-17Rio de JaneiroR32clayAlbert Ramos6-2 6-0
2013-07-22UmagR32clayLeonardo Mayer6-1 6-3
2013-02-18Buenos AiresR16clayAlbert Ramos6-3 7-6(3)
2011-01-31SantiagoR32clayAlbert Ramos6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Mayer L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Mayer L.

Serve advantage — Mayer L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Mayer L.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
51%
Service points won·Slight edge
65%
60%
Return points won·Even
36%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.1
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Mayer L.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
29
59
Break points saved·Even
93
95
Break points won·Dominant
10
49
Deciding sets·Dominant
11
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Cuevas P.[5]
Vanni L.
6-43-67-64
Semi-finals
Cuevas P.[5]
Giraldo S.[6]
6-46-3
Vanni L.
Souza J.
6-46-756-4
Quarter-finals
Giraldo S.[6]
Fognini F.[3]
7-647-5
Vanni L.
Lajovic D.
7-657-64
Cuevas P.[5]
Almagro N.
7-663-66-2
Souza J.
Mayer L.[4]
6-43-66-3
R16
Cuevas P.[5]
Bagnis F.
5-1
Vanni L.
De Bakker T.
7-653-66-3
Lajovic D.
Verdasco F.[7]
6-766-36-4
Giraldo S.[6]
Berlocq C.
4-67-56-3
Almagro N.
Robredo T.[2]
6-37-61
Mayer L.[4]
Ramos A.
6-43-66-1
Fognini F.[3]
Schwartzman D.
6-31-66-2
Souza J.
Klizan M.[8]
3-66-36-2
R32
De Bakker T.
Monaco J.
6-757-646-4
Lajovic D.
Andujar P.
3-66-36-2
Verdasco F.[7]
Gonzalez M.
6-26-3
Klizan M.[8]
Bellucci T.
5-76-37-5
Giraldo S.[6]
Coppejans K.
7-57-64
Berlocq C.
Pella G.
6-47-64
Schwartzman D.
Lorenzi P.
7-56-4
Bagnis F.
Delbonis F.
6-32-66-4
Ramos A.
Clezar G.
7-57-5
Cuevas P.[5]
Vesely J.
6-43-67-5
Almagro N.
Rola B.
7-636-4
Souza J.
Carreno Busta P.
6-27-66