Adrian Ungur vs Christian Lindell — Sao Paulo Qualifying Round 2

Sao Paulo · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
ROU7
Adrian Ungur
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
SWE
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Ungur A.
6-4 6-4
Lindell C.
Ungur A.
662
Lindell C.
440

Adrian Ungur defeated Christian Lindell 6-4 6-4 in the Sao Paulo qualifying round 2 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Adrian Ungur had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 9 on clay. Adrian Ungur claimed a first win over Christian Lindell in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Adrian Ungur edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-09-12Davis Cup G1 PO: ROU vs SWERRclayChristian Lindell7-5 7-6(2) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ungur A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Lindell C.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ungur A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ungur A.Lindell C.
1st serve in·Even
61%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.1
4.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (113 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ungur A.Lindell C.
Clutch Rating·Even
21
17
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
54
Break points won·Even
23
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
29
34
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Ghem A.
6-41-66-3
Pella G.
Ungur A.[7]
6-33-66-2
De Bakker T.[5]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-16-4
Vanni L.[6]
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4
Q2
De Bakker T.[5]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Ungur A.[7]
Lindell C.
6-46-4
Ghem A.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[4]
Neis F.
6-36-4
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
7-52-0
Pella G.
Haider Maurer A.[1]
6-14-67-64
Vanni L.[6]
Dutra Silva R.
6-26-4
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Lopes T.
6-16-766-3
Q1
Lopes T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Vanni L.[6]
Tsuchiya A.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Sorgi J.
6-06-1
Dutra Silva R.
Cuevas M.
6-44-66-1
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
3-66-27-61
Pella G.
Collarini A.
5-76-16-4
Ungur A.[7]
Severino C.
7-57-5
De Bakker T.[5]
Volandri F.
6-16-2
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-17-5
Lapentti G.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Romboli F.
6-46-4
Neis F.
Miele A.
6-16-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Silva C.
6-26-0
Ghem A.
Cunha H.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[8]
Zampieri C.
6-746-46-4