Maximo Gonzalez vs Andre Ghem — Sao Paulo Qualifying Final

Sao Paulo · ATP · Qualifying Final
ARG3
Maximo Gonzalez
42 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
BRA
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
Gonzalez M.
6-4 1-6 6-3
Ghem A.
Gonzalez M.
6162
Ghem A.
4631

Maximo Gonzalez defeated Andre Ghem 6-4 1-6 6-3 in the Sao Paulo qualifying final on clay. The result followed the form book — Maximo Gonzalez came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Maximo Gonzalez extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Maximo Gonzalez closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 6–3.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-07-27KitzbuhelQ3clayMaximo Gonzalez6-4 3-6 6-3
2014-02-24Sao PauloQ1clayMaximo Gonzalez6-4 7-6(7)

Serve vs return

This season
Gonzalez M.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Ghem A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Gonzalez M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gonzalez M.Ghem A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.9
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (155 vs 152). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gonzalez M.Ghem A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
23
8
Break points saved·Slight edge
66
56
Break points won·Clear edge
32
17
Deciding sets·Clear edge
31
10
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
17
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Ghem A.
6-41-66-3
Pella G.
Ungur A.[7]
6-33-66-2
De Bakker T.[5]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-16-4
Vanni L.[6]
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4
Q2
De Bakker T.[5]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Ungur A.[7]
Lindell C.
6-46-4
Ghem A.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[4]
Neis F.
6-36-4
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
7-52-0
Pella G.
Haider Maurer A.[1]
6-14-67-64
Vanni L.[6]
Dutra Silva R.
6-26-4
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Lopes T.
6-16-766-3
Q1
Lopes T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Vanni L.[6]
Tsuchiya A.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Sorgi J.
6-06-1
Dutra Silva R.
Cuevas M.
6-44-66-1
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
3-66-27-61
Pella G.
Collarini A.
5-76-16-4
Ungur A.[7]
Severino C.
7-57-5
De Bakker T.[5]
Volandri F.
6-16-2
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-17-5
Lapentti G.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Romboli F.
6-46-4
Neis F.
Miele A.
6-16-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Silva C.
6-26-0
Ghem A.
Cunha H.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[8]
Zampieri C.
6-746-46-4