Andre Ghem vs Marco Cecchinato — Sao Paulo Qualifying Round 2

Sao Paulo · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
BRA
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
Marco Cecchinato
ITA8
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$149kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWLLW
Ghem A.
6-3 7-6
Cecchinato M.
Ghem A.
6772
Cecchinato M.
3630

Andre Ghem defeated Marco Cecchinato 6-3 7-6 in the Sao Paulo qualifying round 2 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Andre Ghem closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ghem A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Cecchinato M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ghem A.Cecchinato M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
39%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
2.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.5
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (152 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ghem A.Cecchinato M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
42
Break points saved·Dominant
56
89
Break points won·Even
17
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
10
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ghem A.Cecchinato M.
Freshness·
—
69

Cecchinato M.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 37 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Ghem A.
6-41-66-3
Pella G.
Ungur A.[7]
6-33-66-2
De Bakker T.[5]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-16-4
Vanni L.[6]
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4
Q2
De Bakker T.[5]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Ungur A.[7]
Lindell C.
6-46-4
Ghem A.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[4]
Neis F.
6-36-4
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
7-52-0
Pella G.
Haider Maurer A.[1]
6-14-67-64
Vanni L.[6]
Dutra Silva R.
6-26-4
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Lopes T.
6-16-766-3
Q1
Lopes T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Vanni L.[6]
Tsuchiya A.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Sorgi J.
6-06-1
Dutra Silva R.
Cuevas M.
6-44-66-1
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
3-66-27-61
Pella G.
Collarini A.
5-76-16-4
Ungur A.[7]
Severino C.
7-57-5
De Bakker T.[5]
Volandri F.
6-16-2
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-17-5
Lapentti G.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Romboli F.
6-46-4
Neis F.
Miele A.
6-16-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Silva C.
6-26-0
Ghem A.
Cunha H.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[8]
Zampieri C.
6-746-46-4