Thiemo De Bakker vs Elias Ymer — Sao Paulo Qualifying Round 2

Sao Paulo · ATP · Qualifying Round 2
NED5
Thiemo De Bakker
37 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 February 2015
clay
Elias Ymer
SWE
Elias Ymer
#183ATP
1548ELO
1492Clay ELO
$191kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLWWLWWW
De Bakker T.
6-3 6-3
Ymer E.
De Bakker T.
662
Ymer E.
330

Thiemo De Bakker defeated Elias Ymer 6-3 6-3 in the Sao Paulo qualifying round 2 on clay. Thiemo De Bakker extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-04-18BarcelonaR64clayThiemo De Bakker6-4 6-7(3) 6-3
2015-04-20BarcelonaR64clayElias Ymer6-7(4) 7-5 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
De Bakker T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ymer E.

Ymer E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs De Bakker T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
De Bakker T.Ymer E.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.2
4.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (174 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
De Bakker T.Ymer E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
38
48
Break points saved·Even
86
83
Break points won·Clear edge
7
23
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
De Bakker T.Ymer E.
Freshness·
—
100

Ymer E.: 19 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Gonzalez M.[3]
Ghem A.
6-41-66-3
Pella G.
Ungur A.[7]
6-33-66-2
De Bakker T.[5]
Bagnis F.[4]
6-16-4
Vanni L.[6]
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
6-46-4
Q2
De Bakker T.[5]
Ymer E.
6-36-3
Ungur A.[7]
Lindell C.
6-46-4
Ghem A.
Cecchinato M.[8]
6-37-63
Bagnis F.[4]
Neis F.
6-36-4
Gonzalez M.[3]
Lapentti G.
7-52-0
Pella G.
Haider Maurer A.[1]
6-14-67-64
Vanni L.[6]
Dutra Silva R.
6-26-4
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Lopes T.
6-16-766-3
Q1
Lopes T.
Dutra Da Silva D.
6-46-2
Ymer E.
Hocevar R.
6-26-2
Vanni L.[6]
Tsuchiya A.
6-47-5
Lindell C.
Sorgi J.
6-06-1
Dutra Silva R.
Cuevas M.
6-44-66-1
Gonzalez M.[3]
Monteiro T.
3-66-27-61
Pella G.
Collarini A.
5-76-16-4
Ungur A.[7]
Severino C.
7-57-5
De Bakker T.[5]
Volandri F.
6-16-2
Haider Maurer A.[1]
Barrientos N.
6-17-5
Lapentti G.
Kicker N.
6-26-3
Gimeno Traver D.[2]
Romboli F.
6-46-4
Neis F.
Miele A.
6-16-1
Bagnis F.[4]
Silva C.
6-26-0
Ghem A.
Cunha H.
7-56-3
Cecchinato M.[8]
Zampieri C.
6-746-46-4