Andrea Petkovic vs Jarmila GajdosovaFed Cup WG R1: GER vs AUS Round Robin

Fed Cup WG R1: GER vs AUS · WTA · Round Robin
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Saturday, 7 February 2015
hard
39 yrs · 174 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Petkovic A.
6-3 3-6 8-6
Gajdosova J.
Petkovic A.
6382
Gajdosova J.
3661

Andrea Petkovic defeated Jarmila Gajdosova 6-3 3-6 8-6 in the Fed Cup WG R1: GER vs AUS round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Andrea Petkovic came in leading the head-to-head 4–1. Andrea Petkovic extended the head-to-head to 5–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Andrea Petkovic closed it out in three sets, 6–3 3–6 8–6.

Head to head

41
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-01-12SydneyR32hardJarmila Gajdosova6-1 7-6(5)
2011-08-15CincinnatiR64hardAndrea Petkovic5-7 7-6(5) 6-2
2011-05-23Roland GarrosR32clayAndrea Petkovic6-2 4-6 6-3
2011-01-03BrisbaneQFhardAndrea Petkovic6-3 6-4
2007-05-28Roland GarrosR128clayAndrea Petkovic4-6 6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Petkovic A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Gajdosova J.

Gajdosova J.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Petkovic A.

Serve advantage — Petkovic A.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
66%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
61%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
45%
47%
Service points won·Even
55%
58%
Return points won·Slight edge
45%
39%
Break points saved·Even
52%
50%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.7
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 29). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
48
4
Break points saved·Even
39
42
Break points won·Dominant
76
40
Deciding sets·Dominant
73
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
74
44

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About