Renzo Olivo vs Christian Lindell — Quito Qualifying Final

Quito · ATP · Qualifying Final
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 February 2015
clay
SWE
Christian Lindell
34 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
Olivo R.
7-6 6-3
Lindell C.
Olivo R.
7762
Lindell C.
6430

Renzo Olivo defeated Christian Lindell 7-6 6-3 in the Quito qualifying final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Christian Lindell came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Renzo Olivo claimed a first win over Christian Lindell in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Renzo Olivo closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-05-23Roland GarrosQ1clayChristian Lindell6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Lindell C.

Lindell C.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Lindell C.
1st serve in·Even
63%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
59%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
56%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.1
Double faults / match·Even
3.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 123). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Lindell C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
17
Break points saved·Clear edge
33
54
Break points won·Slight edge
15
20
Deciding sets·Slight edge
27
34
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
21

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Q3
Melzer G.[4]
Carballes Baena R.[6]
7-644-67-63
Ghem A.[5]
Londero J.
6-35-76-2
Olivo R.
Lindell C.
7-646-3
Jarry N.
Clezar G.
7-626-4
Q2
Clezar G.
Kubler J.[2]
6-47-5
Ghem A.[5]
Garin C.
6-46-2
Jarry N.
De Paula F.[8]
6-12-67-64
Olivo R.
Ungur A.[3]
6-41-66-3
Lindell C.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-726-46-2
Londero J.
Endara I.
6-43-66-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Lama G.
6-36-4
Melzer G.[4]
Brunstrom J.
6-37-64
Q1
Lama G.
Monroe N.
3-66-46-3
Jarry N.
Sakamoto P.
6-47-64
Lindell C.
Becuzzi E.
6-06-1
De Paula F.[8]
Echazu M.
6-16-1
Olivo R.
Galdos S.
3-66-36-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Collarini A.
7-53-66-3
Ungur A.[3]
Dellien H.
6-36-4
Endara I.
Trinker B.
7-54-66-3
Melzer G.[4]
Reyes Varela M.
6-46-4
Kubler J.[2]
Marach O.
6-26-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Ymer E.[7]
6-46-4
Garin C.
Demoliner M.
6-16-4
Ghem A.[5]
Monteiro T.
7-656-4
Clezar G.
Makiguchi R.
6-35-76-4
Brunstrom J.
Bernardi P.
6-46-4
Londero J.
De Bakker T.[1]
6-46-3