Tatsuma Ito vs Somdev Devvarman — Hong Kong CH Quarter-final

Hong Kong CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN2
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2015
hard
IND7
Somdev Devvarman
41 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Ito T.
6-4 6-4
Devvarman S.
Ito T.
662
Devvarman S.
440

Tatsuma Ito defeated Somdev Devvarman 6-4 6-4 in the Hong Kong CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Somdev Devvarman came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Tatsuma Ito had been the form player, winning 4 of their last 8 on hard. Tatsuma Ito claimed a first win over Somdev Devvarman in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-07-18AtlantaR16hardSomdev Devvarman6-1 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Devvarman S.

Devvarman S.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Devvarman S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 50). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Devvarman S.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
72
Break points won·Clear edge
9
28
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
14
Tiebreaks·Even
48
46

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Edmund K.
Ito T.[2]
6-16-2
Semi-finals
Edmund K.
Nishioka Y.
7-626-0
Ito T.[2]
Chung H.
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Nishioka Y.
Desein N.
6-43-67-66
Chung H.
Kavcic B.[3]
6-46-1
Ito T.[2]
Devvarman S.[7]
6-46-4
Edmund K.
Myneni S.
7-636-1
R16
Desein N.
Matsui T.
1-66-15-5
Devvarman S.[7]
Petzschner P.
4-1
Chung H.
Eysseric J.
6-16-1
Myneni S.
Ramanathan R.
7-57-5
Edmund K.
Ebden M.
7-656-3
Nishioka Y.
Wu D.
6-37-63
Kavcic B.[3]
Gong M.
6-26-4
Ito T.[2]
Rungkat C.
6-16-4
R32
Nishioka Y.
Chen T.
7-54-66-6
Ramanathan R.
Bai Y.
3-66-44-1
Edmund K.
Albot R.
6-47-65
Ebden M.
Sugita Y.[6]
7-627-5
Gong M.
Huang L.
6-37-65
Chung H.
Martin F.
6-46-4
Myneni S.
Berankis R.[1]
7-611-66-3
Wu D.
Wang J.[4]
6-32-66-4
Matsui T.
Thompson J.
6-46-3
Desein N.
Moriya H.[8]
3-66-27-63
Eysseric J.
Duckworth J.[5]
6-36-1
Kavcic B.[3]
Ho C.
6-26-1
Devvarman S.[7]
Bhambri Y.
2-66-46-3
Petzschner P.
Yang T.
6-36-0
Rungkat C.
Singh S.
6-36-4
Ito T.[2]
Li H.
6-47-5