Facundo Bagnis vs Andre Ghem — Bucaramanga CH Round of 32

Bucaramanga CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 27 January 2015
clay
BRA
Andre Ghem
44 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLWWLLL
Bagnis F.
6-3 6-2
Ghem A.
Bagnis F.
662
Ghem A.
320

Facundo Bagnis defeated Andre Ghem 6-3 6-2 in the Bucaramanga CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andre Ghem came in defending last year's quarter-final, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ghem A.

Ghem A.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Ghem A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
63%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.6
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 151). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Ghem A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
54
8
Break points saved·Dominant
92
56
Break points won·Clear edge
35
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
10
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
3
24

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Gimeno Traver D.[7]
Elias G.
6-31-67-5
Semi-finals
Elias G.
Samper Montana J.
6-47-65
Gimeno Traver D.[7]
Bagnis F.
6-46-756-3
Quarter-finals
Elias G.
Melzer G.
6-13-66-2
Bagnis F.
Haider Maurer A.[3]
1-67-56-3
Samper Montana J.
Falla A.[4]
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[7]
Estrella V.[2]
6-06-4
R16
Elias G.
Carballes Baena R.
7-56-2
Falla A.[4]
Donskoy E.
6-27-65
Haider Maurer A.[3]
Pella G.
6-37-5
Melzer G.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-43-66-3
Samper Montana J.
Souza J.[8]
7-656-4
Bagnis F.
Montanes A.[5]
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.[7]
Menendez Maceiras A.
6-37-5
Estrella V.[2]
Struvay E.
6-37-63
R32
Montanes A.[5]
Londero J.
6-4
Haider Maurer A.[3]
Kubler J.
1-66-36-3
Falla A.[4]
De Paula F.
4-66-36-0
Menendez Maceiras A.
Dellien H.
4-66-26-3
Carballes Baena R.
Cervantes Huegun I.
7-56-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Lama G.
6-796-46-3
Melzer G.
Hernandez J.
5-76-46-1
Elias G.
Gonzalez A.[6]
6-16-4
Donskoy E.
Jarry N.
6-36-3
Samper Montana J.
Kim K.
6-16-3
Souza J.[8]
Cuevas M.
6-26-2
Bagnis F.
Ghem A.
6-36-2
Pella G.
Arguello F.
6-46-3
Gimeno Traver D.[7]
Mina G.
6-26-4
Struvay E.
Clezar G.
3-66-36-4
Estrella V.[2]
Ruiz P.
6-36-3