Horacio Zeballos vs Gonzalo Lama — Noumea CH Round of 32

Noumea CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG3
Horacio Zeballos
41 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 January 2015
hard
CHI
Gonzalo Lama
33 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWLL
Zeballos H.
6-1 6-4
Lama G.
Zeballos H.
662
Lama G.
140

Horacio Zeballos defeated Gonzalo Lama 6-1 6-4 in the Noumea CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Horacio Zeballos came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Horacio Zeballos extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-02-03Vina del MarR32clayHoracio Zeballos6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Zeballos H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Lama G.

Lama G.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Zeballos H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zeballos H.Lama G.
1st serve in·Even
61%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
62%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.9
2.7
Double faults / match·Even
2.6
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zeballos H.Lama G.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
45
35
Break points saved·Clear edge
89
75
Break points won·Clear edge
17
0
Deciding sets·Dominant
57
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
58
2

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Darcis S.
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Darcis S.
Mannarino A.[1]
6-47-5
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Wang J.[4]
5-76-47-62
Quarter-finals
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Buchanan C.
6-16-2
Mannarino A.[1]
Klahn B.[8]
4-67-56-1
Darcis S.
Guez D.
6-43-66-2
Wang J.[4]
Clezar G.
6-46-3
R16
Wang J.[4]
Chen T.
6-16-3
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
Tatlot J.
6-06-4
Klahn B.[8]
Mcgee J.
6-46-2
Buchanan C.
Jenkins J.
6-12-67-64
Mannarino A.[1]
Fratangelo B.
6-46-2
Darcis S.
Zeballos H.[3]
6-26-3
Guez D.
Robert S.[6]
6-17-66
Clezar G.
Millot V.
4-67-656-4
R32
Klahn B.[8]
Krajicek A.
6-33-1
Fratangelo B.
Eysseric J.
6-46-0
Menendez Maceiras A.[7]
De Greef A.
3-1
Clezar G.
Sugita Y.[5]
6-46-2
Mcgee J.
Sandgren T.
2-66-06-1
Zeballos H.[3]
Lama G.
6-16-4
Mannarino A.[1]
Couacaud E.
7-57-5
Darcis S.
De Paula F.
6-756-06-3
Guez D.
Westerhof B.
6-25-76-1
Robert S.[6]
Jarry N.
7-616-2
Millot V.
Donaldson J.
6-46-4
Chen T.
Mina G.
6-26-1
Wang J.[4]
Trungelliti M.
6-40-66-4
Tatlot J.
Bourgue M.
6-26-4
Buchanan C.
Lokoli L.
6-36-2
Jenkins J.
De Schepper K.[2]
6-46-4