Jason Kubler vs Kamil Majchrzak — Lima CH Round of 32

Lima CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS3
Jason Kubler
#468ATP
1685ELO
1616Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 17 November 2014
clay
Kamil Majchrzak
POL
Kamil Majchrzak
#66ATP
1801ELO
1723Clay ELO
$617kYTD
$3.8MCAREER
30 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWWWLW
Kubler J.
7-6 1-6 6-4
Majchrzak K.
Kubler J.
77162
Majchrzak K.
63641

Jason Kubler defeated Kamil Majchrzak 7-6 1-6 6-4 in the Lima CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Kamil Majchrzak came in ranked #66.

Key context

  • Match story: Jason Kubler closed it out in three sets, 7–6 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Kubler J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Majchrzak K.

Majchrzak K.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Kubler J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Kubler J.Majchrzak K.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
65%
Aces / match·Even
5.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.3
1.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Kubler J.Majchrzak K.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
68
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
97
Break points won·Slight edge
46
51
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
73
Tiebreaks·Dominant
37
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Kubler J.Majchrzak K.
Freshness·
—
92

Majchrzak K.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Pella G.[8]
Kubler J.[3]
6-26-4
Semi-finals
Kubler J.[3]
Hernandez J.
6-36-2
Pella G.[8]
Saez J.
7-54-66-3
Quarter-finals
Pella G.[8]
Carballes Baena R.[4]
3-67-636-4
Hernandez J.
De Paula F.
6-27-68
Kubler J.[3]
Londero J.[7]
6-36-1
Saez J.
Podlipnik Castillo H.[6]
6-36-1
R16
Hernandez J.
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-15-2
Kubler J.[3]
Panfil G.
6-46-4
Londero J.[7]
Rivera Aranguiz G.
6-36-1
De Paula F.
Garin C.
6-36-3
Pella G.[8]
Alund M.
6-36-1
Podlipnik Castillo H.[6]
Androic T.
6-26-3
Saez J.
Heras P.
6-36-4
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Linzer M.
6-36-2
R32
Rivera Aranguiz G.
Obrien D.
6-26-3
Kubler J.[3]
Majchrzak K.
7-631-66-4
Hernandez J.
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-31-66-0
Garin C.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-746-46-0
Pella G.[8]
Ramirez Hidalgo R.
7-6126-746-4
Androic T.
Galdos S.
6-36-3
Saez J.
Arevalo M.
6-36-2
Panfil G.
Varillas J.
6-26-2
Alund M.
Ulloa E.
6-06-0
Podlipnik Castillo H.[6]
Beretta D.
6-36-4
De Paula F.
Sanchez R.
6-46-4
Londero J.[7]
Echazu M.
4-66-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Panta Herreros J.
6-06-2
Heras P.
Bagnis F.[2]
2-66-47-5
Linzer M.
Cacic N.
6-06-1
Munoz de la Nava D.
Kohen A.
6-36-4