Michal Przysiezny vs Tatsuma Ito — Geneva CH Round of 16

Geneva CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
POL
Michal Przysiezny
42 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2014
hard
JPN4
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Przysiezny M.
6-1 6-4
Ito T.
Przysiezny M.
662
Ito T.
140

Michal Przysiezny defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-1 6-4 in the Geneva CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Michal Przysiezny claimed a first win over Tatsuma Ito in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-08-25US OpenQ3hardTatsuma Ito6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Przysiezny M.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Przysiezny M.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Przysiezny M.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
62%
Return points won·Even
34%
38%
Break points saved·Even
63%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.0
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (167 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Przysiezny M.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
30
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
79
61
Break points won·Slight edge
16
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
38
43
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
38
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Draw

Final
Baghdatis M.[6]
Przysiezny M.
6-14-66-3
Semi-finals
Baghdatis M.[6]
Albot R.
6-36-3
Przysiezny M.
Bolelli S.[2]
7-626-4
Quarter-finals
Przysiezny M.
Hanescu V.
7-666-736-2
Albot R.
Dzumhur D.[7]
6-36-1
Baghdatis M.[6]
Vesely J.[1]
6-47-5
Bolelli S.[2]
Darcis S.
6-32-66-1
R16
Albot R.
Lacko L.[3]
5-1
Dzumhur D.[7]
Berrer M.
3-66-45-5
Przysiezny M.
Ito T.[4]
6-16-4
Baghdatis M.[6]
Troicki V.
6-26-3
Bolelli S.[2]
Marchenko I.
7-54-66-4
Hanescu V.
Krajinovic F.[5]
4-67-637-62
Darcis S.
Copil M.
0-66-46-4
Vesely J.[1]
Wang J.
6-46-2
R32
Albot R.
Delic M.
7-623-66-3
Darcis S.
Gojowczyk P.[8]
6-23-0
Vesely J.[1]
Melzer G.
7-616-3
Copil M.
Baumann M.
3-66-26-4
Wang J.
Lammer M.
4-66-17-5
Bolelli S.[2]
Laaksonen H.
6-43-66-3
Troicki V.
Cecchinato M.
6-36-2
Baghdatis M.[6]
Pavic A.
6-46-2
Berrer M.
Ehrat S.
6-11-67-64
Dzumhur D.[7]
Dustov F.
6-26-2
Krajinovic F.[5]
Chiudinelli M.
6-46-766-3
Hanescu V.
Fucsovics M.
6-34-66-4
Przysiezny M.
Marti Y.
7-666-4
Ito T.[4]
Nishioka Y.
7-656-2
Marchenko I.
Skugor F.
7-626-3
Lacko L.[3]
Ungur A.
6-43-66-4