Dominika Cibulkova vs Carla Suarez NavarroTournament of Champions Round Robin

Tournament of Champions · WTA · Round Robin
37 yrs · 161 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 27 October 2014
hard
37 yrs · 162 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLWLW
Cibulkova D.
7-5 6-4
Suarez Navarro C.
Cibulkova D.
762
Suarez Navarro C.
540

Dominika Cibulkova defeated Carla Suarez Navarro 7-5 6-4 in the Tournament of Champions round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominika Cibulkova came in leading the head-to-head 4–2. Dominika Cibulkova extended the head-to-head to 5–2.

Key context

Head to head

42
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-09-18TokyoR32hardDominika Cibulkova6-3 6-3
2016-10-10LinzSFhardDominika Cibulkova6-4 6-3
2016-05-23Roland GarrosR32clayCarla Suarez Navarro6-4 3-6 6-1
2015-10-19MoscowR16hardCarla Suarez Navarro6-4 7-5
2015-09-21TokyoR16hardDominika Cibulkova6-4 6-4
2014-01-13Australian OpenR32hardDominika Cibulkova6-1 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Cibulkova D.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Suarez Navarro C.

Suarez Navarro C.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cibulkova D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
67%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
62%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
57%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Even
56%
55%
Aces / match·Even
1.0
1.2
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.5
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
71
59
Break points saved·Clear edge
78
57
Break points won·Even
87
85
Deciding sets·Slight edge
72
67
Tiebreaks·Even
83
83

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About