Dominic Thiem vs Lukas Rosol — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
AUT
Dominic Thiem
32 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 5 October 2014
hard
CZE
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Thiem D.
6-4 7-6
Rosol L.
Thiem D.
6772
Rosol L.
4630

Dominic Thiem defeated Lukas Rosol 6-4 7-6 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Dominic Thiem came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Dominic Thiem extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-03-19Miami MastersR128hardDominic Thiem7-6(6) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Thiem D.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Thiem D.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Thiem D.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
62%
Return points won·Even
36%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.2
4.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Thiem D.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
85
51
Break points saved·Slight edge
98
89
Break points won·Dominant
58
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
99
77
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
97
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 57%
Final
Federer R.[3]
Simon G.
7-667-62
Semi-finals
Federer R.[3]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-46-4
Simon G.
Lopez F.
6-27-61
Quarter-finals
Simon G.
Berdych T.[6]
7-644-66-0
Federer R.[3]
Benneteau J.
7-646-0
Djokovic N.[1]
Ferrer D.[5]
6-46-2
Lopez F.
Youzhny M.
5-76-46-4
R16
Lopez F.
Isner J.[13]
6-36-4
Berdych T.[6]
Karlovic I.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Youzhny M.
Monaco J.
5-76-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-34-66-4
Ferrer D.[5]
Murray A.[11]
2-66-16-2
Federer R.[3]
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-2
Benneteau J.
Sock J.
6-36-4
R32
Isner J.[13]
Johnson S.
7-667-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Thiem D.
6-36-4
Benneteau J.
Dimitrov G.[10]
7-56-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Pospisil V.
7-613-66-4
Sock J.
Nishikori K.[7]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Wang C.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.
Dodig I.
7-676-746-3
Lopez F.
Nadal R.[2]
6-37-66
Murray A.[11]
Janowicz J.
7-56-2
Kukushkin M.
Anderson K.[16]
6-46-2
Federer R.[3]
Mayer L.
7-53-67-67
Monaco J.
Raonic M.[8]
5-2
Simon G.
Wawrinka S.[4]
5-77-56-4
Berdych T.[6]
Gasquet R.
6-36-1
Ferrer D.[5]
Klizan M.
4-67-646-4
Karlovic I.
Lu Y.
7-666-3
R64
Pospisil V.
Giraldo S.
6-26-756-1
Isner J.[13]
Andujar P.
7-651-66-3
Thiem D.
Rosol L.
6-47-63
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Dolgopolov A.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Tomic B.
7-646-746-4
Gasquet R.
Chardy J.
7-676-2
Lu Y.
Granollers M.
6-36-756-2
Karlovic I.
Cilic M.[9]
7-52-67-62
Wang C.
Fognini F.[15]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Young D.
7-56-4
Youzhny M.
Gulbis E.[12]
6-46-1
Lopez F.
Kokkinakis T.
6-7126-36-4
Monaco J.
Sousa J.
6-27-64
Simon G.
Garcia Lopez G.
3-66-06-1
Anderson K.[16]
Ward J.
3-66-36-2
Dimitrov G.[10]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.
3-67-57-66
Johnson S.
Golubev A.
6-31-66-3
Dodig I.
Cuevas P.
7-56-2
Klizan M.
Groth S.
7-616-3
Mayer L.
Wu D.
6-46-1
Benneteau J.
Zhang Z.
5-76-36-3
Murray A.[11]
Gabashvili T.
6-17-5
Kukushkin M.
Robredo T.
3-66-37-64