Vasek Pospisil vs Santiago Giraldo — Shanghai Masters Round of 64

Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
CAN
Vasek Pospisil
36 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 5 October 2014
hard
COL
Santiago Giraldo
38 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWLLW
Pospisil V.
6-2 6-7 6-1
Giraldo S.
Pospisil V.
66562
Giraldo S.
27711

Vasek Pospisil defeated Santiago Giraldo 6-2 6-7 6-1 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Vasek Pospisil came in leading the head-to-head 3–0, defending last year's round of 32. Vasek Pospisil extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Vasek Pospisil came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–2 6–7 6–1.

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-10-26ValenciaR32hardVasek Pospisil6-4 6-3
2014-09-12Davis Cup WG PO: CAN vs COLRRhardVasek Pospisil6-3 7-6(2) 6-3
2014-07-28WashingtonQFhardVasek Pospisil6-7(4) 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Pospisil V.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Giraldo S.

Giraldo S.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Pospisil V.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Pospisil V.Giraldo S.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
78%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
66%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.9
3.7
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Pospisil V.Giraldo S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
28
Break points saved·Clear edge
96
82
Break points won·Clear edge
7
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
62
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
72
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 57%
Final
Federer R.[3]
Simon G.
7-667-62
Semi-finals
Federer R.[3]
Djokovic N.[1]
6-46-4
Simon G.
Lopez F.
6-27-61
Quarter-finals
Simon G.
Berdych T.[6]
7-644-66-0
Federer R.[3]
Benneteau J.
7-646-0
Djokovic N.[1]
Ferrer D.[5]
6-46-2
Lopez F.
Youzhny M.
5-76-46-4
R16
Lopez F.
Isner J.[13]
6-36-4
Berdych T.[6]
Karlovic I.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Youzhny M.
Monaco J.
5-76-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-34-66-4
Ferrer D.[5]
Murray A.[11]
2-66-16-2
Federer R.[3]
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-2
Benneteau J.
Sock J.
6-36-4
R32
Isner J.[13]
Johnson S.
7-667-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Thiem D.
6-36-4
Benneteau J.
Dimitrov G.[10]
7-56-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Pospisil V.
7-613-66-4
Sock J.
Nishikori K.[7]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Wang C.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.
Dodig I.
7-676-746-3
Lopez F.
Nadal R.[2]
6-37-66
Murray A.[11]
Janowicz J.
7-56-2
Kukushkin M.
Anderson K.[16]
6-46-2
Federer R.[3]
Mayer L.
7-53-67-67
Monaco J.
Raonic M.[8]
5-2
Simon G.
Wawrinka S.[4]
5-77-56-4
Berdych T.[6]
Gasquet R.
6-36-1
Ferrer D.[5]
Klizan M.
4-67-646-4
Karlovic I.
Lu Y.
7-666-3
R64
Pospisil V.
Giraldo S.
6-26-756-1
Isner J.[13]
Andujar P.
7-651-66-3
Thiem D.
Rosol L.
6-47-63
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Dolgopolov A.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Tomic B.
7-646-746-4
Gasquet R.
Chardy J.
7-676-2
Lu Y.
Granollers M.
6-36-756-2
Karlovic I.
Cilic M.[9]
7-52-67-62
Wang C.
Fognini F.[15]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Young D.
7-56-4
Youzhny M.
Gulbis E.[12]
6-46-1
Lopez F.
Kokkinakis T.
6-7126-36-4
Monaco J.
Sousa J.
6-27-64
Simon G.
Garcia Lopez G.
3-66-06-1
Anderson K.[16]
Ward J.
3-66-36-2
Dimitrov G.[10]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.
3-67-57-66
Johnson S.
Golubev A.
6-31-66-3
Dodig I.
Cuevas P.
7-56-2
Klizan M.
Groth S.
7-616-3
Mayer L.
Wu D.
6-46-1
Benneteau J.
Zhang Z.
5-76-36-3
Murray A.[11]
Gabashvili T.
6-17-5
Kukushkin M.
Robredo T.
3-66-37-64