Richard Gasquet vs Jeremy Chardy — Shanghai Masters Round of 64
Shanghai Masters · ATP · Round of 64
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 5 October 2014
hard
Gasquet R.7-6 6-2
Chardy J.
Gasquet R.
7962
Chardy J.
6720
Richard Gasquet defeated Jeremy Chardy 7-6 6-2 in the Shanghai Masters round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 4–3, defending last year's round of 64. Richard Gasquet extended the head-to-head to 5–3.
Key context
- Match story: Richard Gasquet closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.
Head to head
4–3| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | Hamburg | R16 | clay | Jeremy Chardy | 7-6(5) 7-5 |
| 2019-05-13 | Rome Masters | R64 | clay | Jeremy Chardy | 6-1 4-6 6-3 |
| 2018-06-11 | s Hertogenbosch | F | grass | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 7-6(5) |
| 2018-04-16 | Monte Carlo Masters | R64 | clay | Richard Gasquet | 6-4 7-6(5) |
| 2018-03-19 | Miami Masters | R64 | hard | Jeremy Chardy | 7-5 6-1 |
| 2015-10-19 | Stockholm | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 2-6 6-3 7-6(4) |
| 2009-01-12 | Sydney | QF | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 7-6(4) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
8.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.1
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Slight edge
75
66
Break points saved·Even
97
97
Break points won·Clear edge
49
28
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
95
Tiebreaks·Dominant
94
55
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Weather
24°CClear
Wind 20 km/hHumidity 57%
Quarter-finals
Simon G.
Berdych T.[6]
7-644-66-0
Federer R.[3]
Benneteau J.
7-646-0
Djokovic N.[1]
Ferrer D.[5]
6-46-2
Lopez F.
Youzhny M.
5-76-46-4
R16
Lopez F.
Isner J.[13]
6-36-4
Berdych T.[6]
Karlovic I.
6-36-4
Simon G.
Jaziri M.
6-26-3
Youzhny M.
Monaco J.
5-76-36-2
Djokovic N.[1]
Kukushkin M.
6-34-66-4
Ferrer D.[5]
Murray A.[11]
2-66-16-2
Federer R.[3]
Bautista Agut R.[14]
6-46-2
Benneteau J.
Sock J.
6-36-4
R32
Isner J.[13]
Johnson S.
7-667-67
Djokovic N.[1]
Thiem D.
6-36-4
Benneteau J.
Dimitrov G.[10]
7-56-3
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Pospisil V.
7-613-66-4
Sock J.
Nishikori K.[7]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Wang C.
6-06-4
Youzhny M.
Dodig I.
7-676-746-3
Lopez F.
Nadal R.[2]
6-37-66
Murray A.[11]
Janowicz J.
7-56-2
Kukushkin M.
Anderson K.[16]
6-46-2
Federer R.[3]
Mayer L.
7-53-67-67
Monaco J.
Raonic M.[8]
5-2
Simon G.
Wawrinka S.[4]
5-77-56-4
Berdych T.[6]
Gasquet R.
6-36-1
Ferrer D.[5]
Klizan M.
4-67-646-4
Karlovic I.
Lu Y.
7-666-3
R64
Pospisil V.
Giraldo S.
6-26-756-1
Isner J.[13]
Andujar P.
7-651-66-3
Thiem D.
Rosol L.
6-47-63
Bautista Agut R.[14]
Dolgopolov A.
6-46-4
Sock J.
Tomic B.
7-646-746-4
Gasquet R.
Chardy J.
7-676-2
Lu Y.
Granollers M.
6-36-756-2
Karlovic I.
Cilic M.[9]
7-52-67-62
Wang C.
Fognini F.[15]
7-656-4
Jaziri M.
Young D.
7-56-4
Youzhny M.
Gulbis E.[12]
6-46-1
Lopez F.
Kokkinakis T.
6-7126-36-4
Monaco J.
Sousa J.
6-27-64
Simon G.
Garcia Lopez G.
3-66-06-1
Anderson K.[16]
Ward J.
3-66-36-2
Dimitrov G.[10]
Istomin D.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.
3-67-57-66
Johnson S.
Golubev A.
6-31-66-3
Dodig I.
Cuevas P.
7-56-2
Klizan M.
Groth S.
7-616-3
Mayer L.
Wu D.
6-46-1
Benneteau J.
Zhang Z.
5-76-36-3
Murray A.[11]
Gabashvili T.
6-17-5
Kukushkin M.
Robredo T.
3-66-37-64