Shahar Peer vs Pauline Parmentier — Guangzhou Round of 32

Guangzhou · WTA · Round of 32
ISR
Shahar Peer
39 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2014
hard
FRA
Pauline Parmentier
40 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLWL
Peer S.
7-6 6-3
Parmentier P.
Peer S.
71062
Parmentier P.
6830

Shahar Peer defeated Pauline Parmentier 7-6 6-3 in the Guangzhou round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Shahar Peer came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending last year's round of 32. Shahar Peer extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Shahar Peer closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-08-15CincinnatiR32hardShahar Peer6-2 6-3
2010-08-30US OpenR64hardShahar Peer6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Peer S.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Parmentier P.

Parmentier P.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Peer S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Peer S.Parmentier P.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
58%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
45%
Service points won·Even
53%
56%
Return points won·Even
45%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
47%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.6
2.8
Double faults / match·Even
4.0
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (49 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Peer S.Parmentier P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
39
15
Break points saved·Slight edge
34
39
Break points won·Dominant
73
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
62
53
Tiebreaks·Dominant
68
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Niculescu M.
Cornet A.[2]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Niculescu M.
Wang Y.
6-06-2
Cornet A.[2]
Bacsinszky T.
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Wang Y.
Zhang K.
3-66-26-2
Niculescu M.
Puig M.
6-26-2
Bacsinszky T.
Torro Flor M.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[2]
Hsieh S.
7-656-1
R16
Wang Y.
Martic P.
7-656-3
Zhang K.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Niculescu M.
Doi M.
6-26-1
Puig M.
Zhang L.
6-46-4
Torro Flor M.
Xu Y.
6-757-56-2
Bacsinszky T.
Soler Espinosa S.
6-26-2
Hsieh S.
Zhu L.
6-46-2
Cornet A.[2]
Peer S.
3-67-56-1
R32
Wang Y.
Stosur S.[1]
2-66-26-2
Martic P.
Cirstea S.
7-636-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Larsson J.
6-47-65
Zhang K.
Cepelova J.[7]
6-16-4
Niculescu M.
Jovanovski B.[4]
6-26-2
Doi M.
Piter K.
5-76-46-3
Puig M.
Knapp K.
6-14-66-2
Zhang L.
Diyas Z.[5]
6-46-1
Torro Flor M.
Beck A.[8]
6-47-65
Bacsinszky T.
Linette M.
6-24-66-4
Soler Espinosa S.
Stephens S.[3]
6-34-66-4
Zhu L.
Vinci R.[6]
6-37-67
Hsieh S.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-622-66-4
Peer S.
Parmentier P.
7-686-3
Cornet A.[2]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-1
Xu Y.
Mayr Achleitner P.
6-26-3