Yafan Wang vs Petra Martic — Guangzhou Round of 16

Guangzhou · WTA · Round of 16
CHN
Yafan Wang
#358WTA
1704ELO
1673Hard ELO
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2014
hard
CRO
Petra Martic
#1014WTA
1673ELO
1633Hard ELO
35 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWLLWLL
Wang Y.
7-6 6-3
Martic P.
Wang Y.
7762
Martic P.
6530

Yafan Wang defeated Petra Martic 7-6 6-3 in the Guangzhou round of 16 on hard. Yafan Wang claimed a first win over Petra Martic in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Yafan Wang closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2018-05-28Roland GarrosR128clayPetra Martic6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Wang Y.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Martic P.

Martic P.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Wang Y.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wang Y.Martic P.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
47%
Service points won·Even
56%
59%
Return points won·Even
44%
41%
Break points saved·Even
57%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Even
3.3
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang Y.Martic P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
51
74
Break points saved·Slight edge
76
85
Break points won·Even
62
66
Deciding sets·Clear edge
65
88
Tiebreaks·Dominant
54
86

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Niculescu M.
Cornet A.[2]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Niculescu M.
Wang Y.
6-06-2
Cornet A.[2]
Bacsinszky T.
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Wang Y.
Zhang K.
3-66-26-2
Niculescu M.
Puig M.
6-26-2
Bacsinszky T.
Torro Flor M.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[2]
Hsieh S.
7-656-1
R16
Wang Y.
Martic P.
7-656-3
Zhang K.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Niculescu M.
Doi M.
6-26-1
Puig M.
Zhang L.
6-46-4
Torro Flor M.
Xu Y.
6-757-56-2
Bacsinszky T.
Soler Espinosa S.
6-26-2
Hsieh S.
Zhu L.
6-46-2
Cornet A.[2]
Peer S.
3-67-56-1
R32
Wang Y.
Stosur S.[1]
2-66-26-2
Martic P.
Cirstea S.
7-636-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Larsson J.
6-47-65
Zhang K.
Cepelova J.[7]
6-16-4
Niculescu M.
Jovanovski B.[4]
6-26-2
Doi M.
Piter K.
5-76-46-3
Puig M.
Knapp K.
6-14-66-2
Zhang L.
Diyas Z.[5]
6-46-1
Torro Flor M.
Beck A.[8]
6-47-65
Bacsinszky T.
Linette M.
6-24-66-4
Soler Espinosa S.
Stephens S.[3]
6-34-66-4
Zhu L.
Vinci R.[6]
6-37-67
Hsieh S.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-622-66-4
Peer S.
Parmentier P.
7-686-3
Cornet A.[2]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-1
Xu Y.
Mayr Achleitner P.
6-26-3