Alize Cornet vs Shahar Peer — Guangzhou Round of 16

Guangzhou · WTA · Round of 16
FRA2
Alize Cornet
36 yrs · 173 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 15 September 2014
hard
ISR
Shahar Peer
39 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLLLWL
Cornet A.
3-6 7-5 6-1
Peer S.
Cornet A.
3762
Peer S.
6511

Alize Cornet defeated Shahar Peer 3-6 7-5 6-1 in the Guangzhou round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Shahar Peer came in leading the head-to-head 3–1, defending last year's round of 32. Alize Cornet narrowed the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

Head to head

1–3
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-05-21StrasbourgR16clayAlize Cornet4-6 6-4 6-0
2012-03-19MiamiR128hardShahar Peer6-4 6-2
2010-02-08ParisR32carpetShahar Peer6-4 6-1
2009-07-06BudapestR16clayShahar Peer6-2 6-0

Serve vs return

This season
Cornet A.serving64% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Peer S.

Peer S.serving60% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Cornet A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cornet A.Peer S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
62%
59%
2nd serve points won·Even
44%
42%
Service points won·Even
55%
53%
Return points won·Even
45%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
55%
47%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.7
0.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.9
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 49). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cornet A.Peer S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
53
39
Break points saved·Clear edge
57
34
Break points won·Slight edge
83
73
Deciding sets·Clear edge
74
62
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
47
68

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Niculescu M.
Cornet A.[2]
6-46-0
Semi-finals
Niculescu M.
Wang Y.
6-06-2
Cornet A.[2]
Bacsinszky T.
6-17-65
Quarter-finals
Wang Y.
Zhang K.
3-66-26-2
Niculescu M.
Puig M.
6-26-2
Bacsinszky T.
Torro Flor M.
6-26-3
Cornet A.[2]
Hsieh S.
7-656-1
R16
Wang Y.
Martic P.
7-656-3
Zhang K.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-27-5
Niculescu M.
Doi M.
6-26-1
Puig M.
Zhang L.
6-46-4
Torro Flor M.
Xu Y.
6-757-56-2
Bacsinszky T.
Soler Espinosa S.
6-26-2
Hsieh S.
Zhu L.
6-46-2
Cornet A.[2]
Peer S.
3-67-56-1
R32
Wang Y.
Stosur S.[1]
2-66-26-2
Martic P.
Cirstea S.
7-636-1
Riske Amritraj A.
Larsson J.
6-47-65
Zhang K.
Cepelova J.[7]
6-16-4
Niculescu M.
Jovanovski B.[4]
6-26-2
Doi M.
Piter K.
5-76-46-3
Puig M.
Knapp K.
6-14-66-2
Zhang L.
Diyas Z.[5]
6-46-1
Torro Flor M.
Beck A.[8]
6-47-65
Bacsinszky T.
Linette M.
6-24-66-4
Soler Espinosa S.
Stephens S.[3]
6-34-66-4
Zhu L.
Vinci R.[6]
6-37-67
Hsieh S.
Van Uytvanck A.
7-622-66-4
Peer S.
Parmentier P.
7-686-3
Cornet A.[2]
Putintseva Y.
6-16-1
Xu Y.
Mayr Achleitner P.
6-26-3