Yoshihito Nishioka vs James Duckworth — Shanghai CH Round of 16
Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
#177ATP
1689ELO
1659Hard ELO
$42kYTD
$7.5MCAREER
30 yrs · 170 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Tuesday, 2 September 2014
hard
AUS4#74ATP
1628ELO
1592Hard ELO
$485kYTD
$5.4MCAREER
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLWLL
Nishioka Y.6-4 7-6
Duckworth J.
Nishioka Y.
6772
Duckworth J.
4620
Yoshihito Nishioka defeated James Duckworth 6-4 7-6 in the Shanghai CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — James Duckworth came in ranked #74.
Key context
- Match story: Yoshihito Nishioka edged James Duckworth in two tight sets (6–4 7–6).
Head to head
No previous meetings on record.
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Serve & return on hard
Nishioka Y.Duckworth J.
—
Serve
25
—
Return
13
Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
76%
2nd serve points won·Even
54%
55%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
66%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.3
7.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.5
2.6
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (197 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
84
54
Break points saved·Even
95
97
Break points won·Dominant
59
4
Deciding sets·Clear edge
98
78
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
72
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
91
Duckworth J.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Fabbiano T.[8]
Soeda G.[1]
6-47-60
Nishioka Y.
Udomchoke D.
4-66-26-3
Vanni L.[5]
Bhambri Y.[3]
7-56-736-2
Devvarman S.[2]
Wu D.[7]
6-26-4
R16
Wu D.[7]
Bai Y.
6-26-733-0
Soeda G.[1]
Uchiyama Y.
6-36-3
Bhambri Y.[3]
Yang T.
6-36-746-3
Devvarman S.[2]
Niki T.
6-746-26-3
Fabbiano T.[8]
Thompson J.
6-46-4
Nishioka Y.
Duckworth J.[4]
6-47-62
Udomchoke D.
Millman J.
3-67-646-3
Vanni L.[5]
Singh S.
6-43-66-3
R32
Bai Y.
Zhong S.
3-66-11-0
Udomchoke D.
Chung H.
6-26-1
Devvarman S.[2]
Ito Y.
7-646-3
Soeda G.[1]
Jung J.
6-23-66-2
Yang T.
Edmund K.
7-56-2
Thompson J.
Li Z.
0-67-627-5
Uchiyama Y.
Huang L.
4-66-36-3
Fabbiano T.[8]
Zheng W.
6-36-4
Duckworth J.[4]
Ymer E.
6-43-66-0
Nishioka Y.
Wang C.
6-36-1
Millman J.
Zhang Z.[6]
6-26-2
Vanni L.[5]
Statham J.
3-66-47-5
Singh S.
Kibi Y.
6-16-2
Bhambri Y.[3]
Chen T.
7-56-2
Wu D.[7]
Matsui T.
7-56-3
Niki T.
Takeuchi K.
6-26-3