Sam Querrey vs Pere Riba — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
USA
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2014
hard
ESP
Pere Riba
38 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Querrey S.
7-6 6-4
Riba P.
Querrey S.
7762
Riba P.
6540

Sam Querrey defeated Pere Riba 7-6 6-4 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Pere Riba came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sam Querrey claimed a first win over Pere Riba in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-05-11Rome MastersQ2clayPere Riba7-6(6) 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Querrey S.serving87% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Riba P.

Riba P.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Querrey S.Riba P.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
81%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
68%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
34%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
14.7
5.5
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.8
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 156). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Querrey S.Riba P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
49
37
Break points saved·Dominant
96
53
Break points won·Dominant
14
45
Deciding sets·Even
63
61
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
55
33

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rosol L.[7]
Janowicz J.
3-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Lu Y.[9]
7-54-66-4
Janowicz J.
Querrey S.
4-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Isner J.[1]
W/O
Lu Y.[9]
Seppi A.[14]
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-736-26-4
Janowicz J.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
R16
Isner J.[1]
Kukushkin M.[13]
6-17-63
Rosol L.[7]
Andujar P.[10]
1-66-26-2
Seppi A.[14]
Mahut N.
6-47-67
Lu Y.[9]
Granollers M.[8]
6-16-2
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
4-66-36-4
Goffin D.
Nieminen J.[15]
6-44-66-4
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Young D.[11]
6-746-37-66
Querrey S.
Anderson K.[2]
7-646-4
R32
Rosol L.[7]
Harrison R.
3-62-1
Isner J.[1]
Klahn B.
7-656-2
Andujar P.[10]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Mahut N.
Robredo T.[3]
6-17-60
Seppi A.[14]
Delbonis F.
7-56-746-2
Granollers M.[8]
Mathieu P.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Sousa J.[6]
6-13-67-65
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
Nedovyesov A.
7-696-756-4
Nieminen J.[15]
Becker B.
7-56-4
Goffin D.
Mayer L.[4]
6-36-1
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Brown D.
6-756-26-2
Young D.[11]
Dancevic F.
6-16-3
Querrey S.
Johnson S.[16]
6-46-3
Anderson K.[2]
Mannarino A.
6-32-66-4
Lu Y.[9]
Rola B.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.[13]
Haase R.
5-77-626-4
R64
Haase R.
Paire B.
6-42-66-2
Nedovyesov A.
Giron M.
6-46-4
Klahn B.
Rubin N.
6-20-67-65
Sijsling I.
Golubev A.
7-656-3
Mahut N.
Kavcic B.
6-36-2
Delbonis F.
Klizan M.
7-656-4
Rola B.
Odesnik W.
7-646-3
Mathieu P.
Ginepri R.
6-37-5
Janowicz J.
Berlocq C.
6-16-4
Goffin D.
Melzer J.
6-36-4
Brown D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Bellucci T.
7-53-66-2
Querrey S.
Riba P.
7-656-4
Becker B.
Carreno Busta P.
6-22-66-1
Harrison R.
Struff J.
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-2