Yen Hsun Lu vs Andreas Seppi — Winston-Salem Quarter-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Quarter-final
TPE9
Yen Hsun Lu
42 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2014
hard
ITA14
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Lu Y.
6-4 6-4
Seppi A.
Lu Y.
662
Seppi A.
440

Yen Hsun Lu defeated Andreas Seppi 6-4 6-4 in the Winston-Salem quarter-final on hard. Yen Hsun Lu extended the head-to-head to 3–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Yen Hsun Lu edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

2–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-06-21NottinghamR32grassYen Hsun Lu6-4 6-3
2013-05-19NiceR32clayYen Hsun Lu7-5 1-6 6-4
2010-10-10Shanghai MastersR32hardAndreas Seppi7-6(4) 6-3
2009-08-23New HavenR32hardAndreas Seppi6-7(5) 6-3 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Lu Y.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Seppi A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Lu Y.

Serve advantage — Lu Y.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lu Y.Seppi A.
1st serve in·Even
61%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
66%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Even
5.2
5.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lu Y.Seppi A.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
34
53
Break points saved·Slight edge
88
94
Break points won·Clear edge
29
45
Deciding sets·Dominant
33
63
Tiebreaks·Even
32
32

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rosol L.[7]
Janowicz J.
3-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Lu Y.[9]
7-54-66-4
Janowicz J.
Querrey S.
4-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Isner J.[1]
W/O
Lu Y.[9]
Seppi A.[14]
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-736-26-4
Janowicz J.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
R16
Isner J.[1]
Kukushkin M.[13]
6-17-63
Rosol L.[7]
Andujar P.[10]
1-66-26-2
Seppi A.[14]
Mahut N.
6-47-67
Lu Y.[9]
Granollers M.[8]
6-16-2
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
4-66-36-4
Goffin D.
Nieminen J.[15]
6-44-66-4
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Young D.[11]
6-746-37-66
Querrey S.
Anderson K.[2]
7-646-4
R32
Rosol L.[7]
Harrison R.
3-62-1
Isner J.[1]
Klahn B.
7-656-2
Andujar P.[10]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Mahut N.
Robredo T.[3]
6-17-60
Seppi A.[14]
Delbonis F.
7-56-746-2
Granollers M.[8]
Mathieu P.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Sousa J.[6]
6-13-67-65
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
Nedovyesov A.
7-696-756-4
Nieminen J.[15]
Becker B.
7-56-4
Goffin D.
Mayer L.[4]
6-36-1
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Brown D.
6-756-26-2
Young D.[11]
Dancevic F.
6-16-3
Querrey S.
Johnson S.[16]
6-46-3
Anderson K.[2]
Mannarino A.
6-32-66-4
Lu Y.[9]
Rola B.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.[13]
Haase R.
5-77-626-4
R64
Haase R.
Paire B.
6-42-66-2
Nedovyesov A.
Giron M.
6-46-4
Klahn B.
Rubin N.
6-20-67-65
Sijsling I.
Golubev A.
7-656-3
Mahut N.
Kavcic B.
6-36-2
Delbonis F.
Klizan M.
7-656-4
Rola B.
Odesnik W.
7-646-3
Mathieu P.
Ginepri R.
6-37-5
Janowicz J.
Berlocq C.
6-16-4
Goffin D.
Melzer J.
6-36-4
Brown D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Bellucci T.
7-53-66-2
Querrey S.
Riba P.
7-656-4
Becker B.
Carreno Busta P.
6-22-66-1
Harrison R.
Struff J.
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-2