Jerzy Janowicz vs Sam Querrey — Winston-Salem Semi-final

Winston-Salem · ATP · Semi-final
POL
Jerzy Janowicz
35 yrs · 203 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWWLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2014
hard
USA
Sam Querrey
38 yrs · 198 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWWWL
Janowicz J.
4-6 7-5 6-4
Querrey S.
Janowicz J.
4762
Querrey S.
6541

Jerzy Janowicz defeated Sam Querrey 4-6 7-5 6-4 in the Winston-Salem semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Sam Querrey came in defending last year's semi-final. Jerzy Janowicz extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2014-10-27Paris MastersR64hardSam Querrey6-7(5) 6-2 6-4
2013-05-05Madrid MastersR64clayJerzy Janowicz6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Janowicz J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Querrey S.

Querrey S.serving93% hold

wins 73% of points on serve vs Janowicz J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Janowicz J.Querrey S.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
81%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
68%
Return points won·Even
34%
34%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Dominant
9.0
14.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.6
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (187 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Janowicz J.Querrey S.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
41
49
Break points saved·Even
93
96
Break points won·Even
12
14
Deciding sets·Even
66
63
Tiebreaks·Dominant
21
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rosol L.[7]
Janowicz J.
3-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Lu Y.[9]
7-54-66-4
Janowicz J.
Querrey S.
4-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Isner J.[1]
W/O
Lu Y.[9]
Seppi A.[14]
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-736-26-4
Janowicz J.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
R16
Isner J.[1]
Kukushkin M.[13]
6-17-63
Rosol L.[7]
Andujar P.[10]
1-66-26-2
Seppi A.[14]
Mahut N.
6-47-67
Lu Y.[9]
Granollers M.[8]
6-16-2
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
4-66-36-4
Goffin D.
Nieminen J.[15]
6-44-66-4
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Young D.[11]
6-746-37-66
Querrey S.
Anderson K.[2]
7-646-4
R32
Rosol L.[7]
Harrison R.
3-62-1
Isner J.[1]
Klahn B.
7-656-2
Andujar P.[10]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Mahut N.
Robredo T.[3]
6-17-60
Seppi A.[14]
Delbonis F.
7-56-746-2
Granollers M.[8]
Mathieu P.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Sousa J.[6]
6-13-67-65
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
Nedovyesov A.
7-696-756-4
Nieminen J.[15]
Becker B.
7-56-4
Goffin D.
Mayer L.[4]
6-36-1
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Brown D.
6-756-26-2
Young D.[11]
Dancevic F.
6-16-3
Querrey S.
Johnson S.[16]
6-46-3
Anderson K.[2]
Mannarino A.
6-32-66-4
Lu Y.[9]
Rola B.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.[13]
Haase R.
5-77-626-4
R64
Haase R.
Paire B.
6-42-66-2
Nedovyesov A.
Giron M.
6-46-4
Klahn B.
Rubin N.
6-20-67-65
Sijsling I.
Golubev A.
7-656-3
Mahut N.
Kavcic B.
6-36-2
Delbonis F.
Klizan M.
7-656-4
Rola B.
Odesnik W.
7-646-3
Mathieu P.
Ginepri R.
6-37-5
Janowicz J.
Berlocq C.
6-16-4
Goffin D.
Melzer J.
6-36-4
Brown D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Bellucci T.
7-53-66-2
Querrey S.
Riba P.
7-656-4
Becker B.
Carreno Busta P.
6-22-66-1
Harrison R.
Struff J.
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-2