Igor Sijsling vs Andrey Golubev — Winston-Salem Round of 64

Winston-Salem · ATP · Round of 64
NED
Igor Sijsling
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Sunday, 17 August 2014
hard
KAZ
Andrey Golubev
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Sijsling I.
7-6 6-3
Golubev A.
Sijsling I.
7762
Golubev A.
6530

Igor Sijsling defeated Andrey Golubev 7-6 6-3 in the Winston-Salem round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Igor Sijsling came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 64. Igor Sijsling extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Igor Sijsling closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-04-25MunichQ1clayIgor Sijsling6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Sijsling I.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Golubev A.

Golubev A.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Sijsling I.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sijsling I.Golubev A.
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
38%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Even
4.3
3.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.4
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 159). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sijsling I.Golubev A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
11
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
69
Break points won·Even
16
19
Deciding sets·Slight edge
13
7
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
27
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Rosol L.[7]
Janowicz J.
3-67-637-5
Semi-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Lu Y.[9]
7-54-66-4
Janowicz J.
Querrey S.
4-67-56-4
Quarter-finals
Rosol L.[7]
Isner J.[1]
W/O
Lu Y.[9]
Seppi A.[14]
6-46-4
Querrey S.
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
6-736-26-4
Janowicz J.
Goffin D.
6-46-2
R16
Isner J.[1]
Kukushkin M.[13]
6-17-63
Rosol L.[7]
Andujar P.[10]
1-66-26-2
Seppi A.[14]
Mahut N.
6-47-67
Lu Y.[9]
Granollers M.[8]
6-16-2
Janowicz J.
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
4-66-36-4
Goffin D.
Nieminen J.[15]
6-44-66-4
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Young D.[11]
6-746-37-66
Querrey S.
Anderson K.[2]
7-646-4
R32
Rosol L.[7]
Harrison R.
3-62-1
Isner J.[1]
Klahn B.
7-656-2
Andujar P.[10]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Mahut N.
Robredo T.[3]
6-17-60
Seppi A.[14]
Delbonis F.
7-56-746-2
Granollers M.[8]
Mathieu P.
6-36-3
Janowicz J.
Sousa J.[6]
6-13-67-65
Roger-Vasselin E.[12]
Nedovyesov A.
7-696-756-4
Nieminen J.[15]
Becker B.
7-56-4
Goffin D.
Mayer L.[4]
6-36-1
Garcia Lopez G.[5]
Brown D.
6-756-26-2
Young D.[11]
Dancevic F.
6-16-3
Querrey S.
Johnson S.[16]
6-46-3
Anderson K.[2]
Mannarino A.
6-32-66-4
Lu Y.[9]
Rola B.
6-47-5
Kukushkin M.[13]
Haase R.
5-77-626-4
R64
Haase R.
Paire B.
6-42-66-2
Nedovyesov A.
Giron M.
6-46-4
Klahn B.
Rubin N.
6-20-67-65
Sijsling I.
Golubev A.
7-656-3
Mahut N.
Kavcic B.
6-36-2
Delbonis F.
Klizan M.
7-656-4
Rola B.
Odesnik W.
7-646-3
Mathieu P.
Ginepri R.
6-37-5
Janowicz J.
Berlocq C.
6-16-4
Goffin D.
Melzer J.
6-36-4
Brown D.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-2
Dancevic F.
Bellucci T.
7-53-66-2
Querrey S.
Riba P.
7-656-4
Becker B.
Carreno Busta P.
6-22-66-1
Harrison R.
Struff J.
6-46-2
Mannarino A.
Dzumhur D.
6-26-2