Serena Williams vs Ana IvanovicStanford Quarter-final

Stanford · WTA · Quarter-final
44 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 July 2014
hard
38 yrs · 184 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
Williams S.
2-6 6-3 7-5
Ivanovic A.
Williams S.
2672
Ivanovic A.
6351

Serena Williams defeated Ana Ivanovic 2-6 6-3 7-5 in the Stanford quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Serena Williams came in leading the head-to-head 8–1. Serena Williams extended the head-to-head to 9–1.

Key context

Head to head

81
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-08-17CincinnatiQFhardSerena Williams3-6 6-4 6-2
2014-10-20WTA FinalsRRhardSerena Williams6-4 6-4
2014-08-11CincinnatiFhardSerena Williams6-4 6-1
2014-05-12RomeSFclaySerena Williams6-1 3-6 6-1
2014-01-13Australian OpenR16hardAna Ivanovic4-6 6-3 6-3
2012-08-27US OpenQFhardSerena Williams6-1 6-3
2011-08-29US OpenR16hardSerena Williams6-3 6-4
2009-02-16DubaiQFhardSerena Williams6-4 6-4
2006-08-28US OpenR32hardSerena Williams6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Williams S.serving81% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ivanovic A.

Ivanovic A.serving71% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Williams S.

Serve advantage — Williams S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
75%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
59%
Return points won·Even
46%
46%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.7
3.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 131). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
95
62
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
84
Break points won·Slight edge
96
86
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
50
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
95
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast