Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Daniel Cox — Binghamton CH Semi-final

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
UKR2
Sergiy Stakhovsky
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2014
hard
GBR
Daniel Cox
35 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWLWLWLW
Stakhovsky S.
6-2 6-4
Cox D.
Stakhovsky S.
662
Cox D.
240

Sergiy Stakhovsky defeated Daniel Cox 6-2 6-4 in the Binghamton CH semi-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Sergiy Stakhovsky came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sergiy Stakhovsky extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2011-06-20WimbledonR128grassSergiy Stakhovsky6-2 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Stakhovsky S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Cox D.

Cox D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Stakhovsky S.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Stakhovsky S.Cox D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
59%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
74%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
36%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.8
4.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 100). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Stakhovsky S.Cox D.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
40
30
Break points saved·Dominant
88
52
Break points won·Clear edge
3
27
Deciding sets·Slight edge
57
67
Tiebreaks·Dominant
59
14

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Odesnik W.[8]
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Odesnik W.[8]
Garanganga T.
6-16-2
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Cox D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Odesnik W.[8]
Klahn B.[1]
W/O
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Kokkinakis T.
6-36-2
Garanganga T.
Escobedo E.
2-67-56-4
Cox D.
King D.
6-36-2
R16
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.[3]
W/O
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Nguyen D.
6-46-4
Klahn B.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-37-610
Odesnik W.[8]
Crepaldi E.
6-36-0
Garanganga T.
Williams R.[6]
6-36-736-2
King D.
Nevolo D.
2-66-46-4
Cox D.
Donaldson J.
2-66-46-4
Kokkinakis T.
Krajicek A.[7]
6-46-2
R32
Bangoura S.
Mena F.
6-05-76-2
Garanganga T.
Giron M.
4-66-46-3
Williams R.[6]
Ginepri R.
1-66-47-65
Nevolo D.
Smethurst D.
6-37-63
Donaldson J.
Copil M.[4]
7-56-1
Kudla D.[3]
Krueger M.
7-636-3
Klahn B.[1]
Thompson J.
5-76-16-4
Cox D.
Jenkins J.
6-36-2
Kokkinakis T.
Sarmiento R.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-46-4
King D.
Marchenko I.[5]
7-626-1
Crepaldi E.
Ikramov S.
6-37-5
Odesnik W.[8]
Novikov D.
3-67-56-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Lin W.
7-56-4
Nguyen D.
Shane R.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[2]
King E.
6-16-4