Jared Donaldson vs Marius Copil — Binghamton CH Round of 32

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Jared Donaldson
29 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 14 July 2014
hard
ROU4
Marius Copil
35 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Donaldson J.
7-5 6-1
Copil M.
Donaldson J.
762
Copil M.
510

Jared Donaldson defeated Marius Copil 7-5 6-1 in the Binghamton CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Jared Donaldson came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Jared Donaldson extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Jared Donaldson came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–5 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-05-15Rome MastersQ1clayJared Donaldson1-6 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Donaldson J.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Copil M.

Copil M.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Donaldson J.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Donaldson J.Copil M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
53%
59%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
63%
65%
Return points won·Even
37%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.3
8.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.5
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Donaldson J.Copil M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
35
47
Break points saved·Slight edge
84
91
Break points won·Clear edge
22
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
29
63
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
64
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Odesnik W.[8]
6-47-69
Semi-finals
Odesnik W.[8]
Garanganga T.
6-16-2
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Cox D.
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Odesnik W.[8]
Klahn B.[1]
W/O
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Kokkinakis T.
6-36-2
Garanganga T.
Escobedo E.
2-67-56-4
Cox D.
King D.
6-36-2
R16
Escobedo E.
Kudla D.[3]
W/O
Stakhovsky S.[2]
Nguyen D.
6-46-4
Klahn B.[1]
Bangoura S.
6-37-610
Odesnik W.[8]
Crepaldi E.
6-36-0
Garanganga T.
Williams R.[6]
6-36-736-2
King D.
Nevolo D.
2-66-46-4
Cox D.
Donaldson J.
2-66-46-4
Kokkinakis T.
Krajicek A.[7]
6-46-2
R32
Bangoura S.
Mena F.
6-05-76-2
Garanganga T.
Giron M.
4-66-46-3
Williams R.[6]
Ginepri R.
1-66-47-65
Nevolo D.
Smethurst D.
6-37-63
Donaldson J.
Copil M.[4]
7-56-1
Kudla D.[3]
Krueger M.
7-636-3
Klahn B.[1]
Thompson J.
5-76-16-4
Cox D.
Jenkins J.
6-36-2
Kokkinakis T.
Sarmiento R.
6-26-2
Escobedo E.
Mcdonald M.
3-66-46-4
King D.
Marchenko I.[5]
7-626-1
Crepaldi E.
Ikramov S.
6-37-5
Odesnik W.[8]
Novikov D.
3-67-56-4
Krajicek A.[7]
Lin W.
7-56-4
Nguyen D.
Shane R.
6-46-4
Stakhovsky S.[2]
King E.
6-16-4