Albert Ramos vs Jordan Thompson — Milan CH Round of 32

Milan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ESP3
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 16 June 2014
clay
Jordan Thompson
AUS
Jordan Thompson
#309ATP
1772ELO
1605Clay ELO
$153kYTD
$9.6MCAREER
32 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWLW
Ramos A.
6-2 3-6 7-5
Thompson J.
Ramos A.
6372
Thompson J.
2651

Albert Ramos defeated Jordan Thompson 6-2 3-6 7-5 in the Milan CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Albert Ramos came in leading the head-to-head 3–0. Albert Ramos extended the head-to-head to 4–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Albert Ramos closed it out in three sets, 6–2 3–6 7–5.

Head to head

3–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-04-25EstorilR32clayAlbert Ramos6-4 3-6 6-4
2020-01-13AdelaideR32hardAlbert Ramos6-4 6-7(5) 6-3
2017-07-03WimbledonR128grassAlbert Ramos6-4 6-4 7-6(4)

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Thompson J.

Thompson J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Serve advantage — Thompson J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Thompson J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
54%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.1
7.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.9
1.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Thompson J.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
70
Break points saved·Even
95
97
Break points won·Dominant
49
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
91
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ramos A.[3]
Riba P.[1]
6-37-5
Semi-finals
Ramos A.[3]
Cecchinato M.[6]
6-36-3
Riba P.[1]
Gonzalez M.[5]
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Riba P.[1]
Smirnov A.
4-66-16-1
Gonzalez M.[5]
Arguello F.[4]
5-76-17-63
Ramos A.[3]
Veic A.
6-736-46-3
Cecchinato M.[6]
Lizariturry J.
7-56-3
R16
Veic A.
Trungelliti M.
6-46-4
Ramos A.[3]
Dellien H.
7-676-2
Riba P.[1]
Molteni A.
6-16-2
Smirnov A.
Ungur A.[7]
6-16-2
Arguello F.[4]
Baldi F.
6-26-4
Gonzalez M.[5]
Brizzi A.
6-16-1
Cecchinato M.[6]
Lammer M.
6-07-5
Lizariturry J.
Mina G.
5-76-47-5
R32
Arguello F.[4]
Travaglia S.
6-46-2
Lizariturry J.
Volandri F.[2]
6-46-4
Riba P.[1]
Naso G.
7-57-65
Smirnov A.
Basic M.
6-36-2
Brizzi A.
Olivo R.
6-27-5
Lammer M.
Pavlasek A.
7-656-2
Molteni A.
Setkic A.
6-46-2
Ungur A.[7]
Gaio F.
5-76-16-1
Baldi F.
Novak D.
2-66-37-5
Gonzalez M.[5]
Marcora R.
6-37-5
Veic A.
Starace P.[8]
7-56-3
Trungelliti M.
Donati M.
6-46-4
Dellien H.
Mager G.
4-66-36-1
Ramos A.[3]
Thompson J.
6-23-67-5
Cecchinato M.[6]
Vagnozzi S.
6-36-4
Mina G.
Nishioka Y.
6-16-3