Daniela Hantuchova vs Belinda Bencic — Birmingham Round of 32
Birmingham · WTA · Round of 32
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 June 2014
grass
#14WTA
1989ELO
1791Grass ELO
$1.8MYTD
$17MCAREER
29 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWWWLL
Hantuchova D.6-1 6-4
Bencic B.
Hantuchova D.
662
Bencic B.
140
Daniela Hantuchova defeated Belinda Bencic 6-1 6-4 in the Birmingham round of 32 on grass. The upset overturned the form book — Belinda Bencic came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Daniela Hantuchova claimed a first win over Belinda Bencic in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.
Key context
- Match story: Daniela Hantuchova dropped just 5 games past Belinda Bencic.
Head to head
0–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-25 | Roland Garros | R128 | clay | Belinda Bencic | 6-3 6-3 |
| 2015-03-23 | Miami | R128 | hard | Belinda Bencic | 6-1 7-6(5) |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe advantage — Bencic B.
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Even
63%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
62%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
48%
Service points won·Slight edge
56%
61%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
51%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.7
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (108 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Dominant
57
88
Break points saved·Dominant
68
95
Break points won·Dominant
67
94
Deciding sets·Clear edge
82
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
55
98
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About
Freshness
Recent loadFreshness·
—
88
Bencic B.: 9 days rest · 3 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About
Conditions
Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Draw
Quarter-finals
Zhang S.[9]
Stephens S.[3]
6-36-1
Ivanovic A.[1]
Koukalova K.[6]
6-16-4
Strycova B.
Flipkens K.[4]
6-46-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Date Krumm K.
6-16-0
R16
Ivanovic A.[1]
Davis L.
6-16-1
Koukalova K.[6]
Vandeweghe C.
3-67-636-4
Stephens S.[3]
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
7-642-66-1
Strycova B.
Babos T.
6-20-66-3
Flipkens K.[4]
Wozniak A.
1-67-56-4
Date Krumm K.
Hantuchova D.[7]
6-46-0
Dellacqua C.[16]
Stosur S.[2]
2-66-26-2
Zhang S.[9]
Cetkovska P.
6-07-66
R32
Ivanovic A.[1]
Barthel M.
6-46-1
Davis L.
Duval V.
6-22-66-2
Vandeweghe C.
Wickmayer Y.
5-77-56-1
Stephens S.[3]
Schiavone F.
6-26-4
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok N.
7-646-1
Zhang S.[9]
Peer S.
6-33-66-2
Cetkovska P.
Rybarikova M.[8]
6-47-5
Babos T.
Keys M.[11]
6-26-1
Wozniak A.
Konta J.
6-46-2
Flipkens K.[4]
Giorgi C.
6-36-2
Date Krumm K.
Puig M.[12]
2-66-47-67
Stosur S.[2]
Mchale C.
6-16-3
Strycova B.
Safarova L.[5]
6-33-67-5
Hantuchova D.[7]
Bencic B.
6-16-4
Koukalova K.[6]
Razzano V.
5-77-657-60
Dellacqua C.[16]
Lepchenko V.
6-46-3
R64
Barthel M.
Tomljanovic A.
6-16-4
Davis L.
Paszek T.
6-33-66-2
Duval V.
Garcia C.[13]
6-26-4
Wickmayer Y.
Jovanovski B.[10]
6-46-4
Vandeweghe C.
Diyas Z.
6-47-5
Razzano V.
Pliskova K.
7-616-3
Kichenok N.
Fichman S.
6-767-626-3
Riske Amritraj A.[15]
Kichenok L.
7-636-3
Zhang S.[9]
Daniilidou E.
7-56-4
Peer S.
Mladenovic K.
4-66-26-2
Cetkovska P.
Cadantu Ignatik A.
6-36-4
Strycova B.
Broady N.
5-76-46-3
Babos T.
Erakovic M.
6-36-4
Keys M.[11]
Pereira T.
6-36-3
Konta J.
Nara K.[14]
6-36-1
Bencic B.
Vekic D.
6-46-4
Date Krumm K.
Ormaechea P.
6-36-1
Puig M.[12]
Voegele S.
6-736-26-2
Dellacqua C.[16]
Radwanska U.
6-16-3
Lepchenko V.
Van Uytvanck A.
6-46-0
Mchale C.
Schmiedlova A.
7-656-4
Giorgi C.
Dunne K.
4-66-12-1
Schiavone F.
Zheng J.
6-36-4
Wozniak A.
Watson H.
2-67-56-4