Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Denis IstominDusseldorf Semi-final

Dusseldorf · ATP · Semi-final
42 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Sunday, 18 May 2014
clay
39 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Kohlschreiber P.
6-2 4-6 6-4
Istomin D.
Kohlschreiber P.
6462
Istomin D.
2641

Philipp Kohlschreiber defeated Denis Istomin 6-2 4-6 6-4 in the Dusseldorf semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Denis Istomin came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Philipp Kohlschreiber narrowed the head-to-head to 5–3.

Key context

Head to head

25
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-09-20MetzQ1hardPhilipp Kohlschreiber7-5 6-3
2018-07-30KitzbuhelR16clayDenis Istomin5-7 6-3 6-1
2018-06-11StuttgartR32grassDenis Istomin7-6(2) 7-6(3)
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR64clayPhilipp Kohlschreiber6-3 7-6(5) 6-2
2014-04-28MunichR32clayDenis Istomin7-5 2-6 6-4
2011-06-20WimbledonR128grassDenis Istomin4-6 6-3 6-3 6-3
2010-02-08San JoseQFhardDenis Istomin6-1 1-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Kohlschreiber P.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Istomin D.

Istomin D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Kohlschreiber P.

Serve advantage — Kohlschreiber P.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
55%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
63%
61%
Aces / match·Even
4.8
5.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
1.8
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
56
29
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
90
Break points won·Dominant
39
5
Deciding sets·Slight edge
51
44
Tiebreaks·Dominant
73
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About