Monica Puig vs Daniela Hantuchova — Rome Round of 64

Rome · WTA · Round of 64
PUR
Monica Puig
32 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 12 May 2014
clay
SVK
Daniela Hantuchova
43 yrs · 181 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLLW
Puig M.
6-0 4-6 6-0
Hantuchova D.
Puig M.
6462
Hantuchova D.
0601

Monica Puig defeated Daniela Hantuchova 6-0 4-6 6-0 in the Rome round of 64 on clay. Monica Puig extended the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

1–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-02-27AcapulcoR16hardMonica Puig6-4 6-4
2015-03-02MonterreyR32hardDaniela Hantuchova7-6(1) 3-6 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Puig M.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Hantuchova D.

Hantuchova D.serving67% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Puig M.

Serve advantage — Puig M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Puig M.Hantuchova D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
58%
57%
Return points won·Even
44%
42%
Break points saved·Even
56%
52%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.1
2.3
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.4
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 108). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Puig M.Hantuchova D.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
63
68
Break points won·Slight edge
62
67
Deciding sets·Dominant
55
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
30
55

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Weather
21°COvercast
Wind 8 km/hHumidity 62%

Draw

Final
Williams S.[1]
Errani S.[10]
6-36-0
Semi-finals
Williams S.[1]
Ivanovic A.[11]
6-13-66-1
Errani S.[10]
Jankovic J.[6]
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Williams S.[1]
Zhang S.
6-16-3
Ivanovic A.[11]
Suarez Navarro C.[13]
6-43-66-4
Jankovic J.[6]
Radwanska A.[3]
6-46-4
Errani S.[10]
Li N.[2]
6-34-66-2
R16
Zhang S.
Mchale C.
6-24-66-2
Ivanovic A.[11]
Sharapova M.[8]
6-16-4
Jankovic J.[6]
Pennetta F.[12]
6-26-3
Radwanska A.[3]
Schiavone F.
6-46-1
Errani S.[10]
Cetkovska P.
6-47-63
Li N.[2]
Stosur S.
6-36-1
Williams S.[1]
Lepchenko V.
6-16-2
Suarez Navarro C.[13]
Halep S.[4]
DEF
R32
Williams S.[1]
Petkovic A.
6-26-2
Lepchenko V.
Stephens S.[16]
6-26-2
Mchale C.
Giorgi C.
1-66-36-1
Zhang S.
Kvitova P.[5]
7-665-76-3
Halep S.[4]
Keys M.
5-76-06-1
Suarez Navarro C.[13]
Williams V.
6-46-2
Ivanovic A.[11]
Cornet A.
7-617-5
Sharapova M.[8]
Puig M.
6-37-5
Schiavone F.
Muguruza G.
3-66-17-65
Radwanska A.[3]
Ormaechea P.
6-36-2
Cetkovska P.
Kerber A.[7]
4-66-36-4
Errani S.[10]
Makarova K.
6-26-3
Stosur S.
Vesnina E.
6-26-3
Jankovic J.[6]
Kuznetsova S.
6-24-0
Li N.[2]
Dellacqua C.
6-16-4
Pennetta F.[12]
Bencic B.
6-22-66-3
R64
Suarez Navarro C.[13]
Barthel M.
6-26-2
Lepchenko V.
Peng S.
6-16-0
Stephens S.[16]
Jovanovski B.
3-66-36-3
Giorgi C.
Cibulkova D.[9]
6-47-62
Mchale C.
Cirstea S.
6-34-66-1
Keys M.
Riske Amritraj A.
6-26-2
Ivanovic A.[11]
Knapp K.
6-16-1
Cornet A.
Flipkens K.
6-36-2
Kuznetsova S.
Kirilenko M.
7-56-0
Muguruza G.
Burnett N.
6-16-3
Ormaechea P.
Nara K.
6-46-3
Cetkovska P.
Pironkova T.
1-66-16-4
Makarova K.
Vinci R.
6-27-66
Errani S.[10]
Scheepers C.
7-56-3
Stosur S.
Lisicki S.[15]
6-36-3
Vesnina E.
Svitolina E.
6-26-3
Dellacqua C.
Rybarikova M.
4-66-16-4
Williams V.
Beck A.
6-36-1
Bencic B.
Pavlyuchenkova A.
6-33-66-3
Schiavone F.
Bouchard E.[17]
6-46-2
Pennetta F.[12]
Meusburger Y.
6-26-3
Puig M.
Hantuchova D.
6-04-66-0
Zhang S.
Davis L.
6-46-0
Petkovic A.
Oprandi R.
6-36-0