Luke Saville vs Go Soeda — Gimcheon CH Round of 16

Gimcheon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2014
hard
JPN3
Go Soeda
41 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWW
Saville L.
7-6 4-6 6-2
Soeda G.
Saville L.
77462
Soeda G.
62621

Luke Saville defeated Go Soeda 7-6 4-6 6-2 in the Gimcheon CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Go Soeda came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Luke Saville had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 6 on hard. Luke Saville claimed a first win over Go Soeda in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Luke Saville closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-01-14Australian OpenR128hardGo Soeda6-7(4) 6-3 6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Saville L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Soeda G.

Soeda G.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Saville L.Soeda G.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
52%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.4
3.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.6
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Saville L.Soeda G.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
61
Break points won·Even
10
14
Deciding sets·Clear edge
29
46
Tiebreaks·Even
30
26

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.[7]
Ito T.[5]
7-655-76-4
Semi-finals
Ito T.[5]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-22-0
Muller G.[7]
Lacko L.[1]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Muller G.[7]
Groth S.[4]
6-36-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Ram R.[2]
6-27-5
Ito T.[5]
Saville L.
6-27-63
Lacko L.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-26-4
R16
Ram R.[2]
Krajicek A.
7-54-67-5
Lacko L.[1]
Bolt A.
7-56-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-16-2
Weintraub A.
Grigelis L.
7-56-1
Groth S.[4]
Jung J.
5-77-656-4
Muller G.[7]
Chen T.
7-56-3
Ito T.[5]
Smethurst D.
6-37-5
Saville L.
Soeda G.[3]
7-624-66-2
R32
Weintraub A.
Moriya H.[8]
6-26-1
Lacko L.[1]
Millman J.
6-41-66-3
Muller G.[7]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-4
Ito T.[5]
Reid M.
7-57-5
Smethurst D.
Yang T.
2-67-56-3
Soeda G.[3]
Chung H.
6-36-4
Chiudinelli M.
Mitchell B.
6-26-4
Grigelis L.
Smith J.
3-66-46-3
Groth S.[4]
Chung H.
4-66-17-66
Chen T.
Kravchuk K.
1-66-27-61
Saville L.
Kim Y.
6-16-2
Sugita Y.[6]
De Voest R.
6-26-4
Krajicek A.
Lim Y.
6-44-66-4
Bolt A.
Kutrovsky D.
2-66-36-4
Jung J.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Ram R.[2]
Wolmarans F.
6-746-36-4