Lukas Lacko vs Amir Weintraub — Gimcheon CH Quarter-final

Gimcheon CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
SVK1
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2014
hard
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Lacko L.
6-2 6-4
Weintraub A.
Lacko L.
662
Weintraub A.
240

Lukas Lacko defeated Amir Weintraub 6-2 6-4 in the Gimcheon CH quarter-final on hard. The result followed the form book — Lukas Lacko came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Lukas Lacko extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-06-06s HertogenboschQ1grassLukas Lacko6-2 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Lacko L.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Weintraub A.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Lacko L.Weintraub A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
35%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
56%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.3
3.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.5
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Lacko L.Weintraub A.
Clutch Rating·Even
26
24
Break points saved·Dominant
86
45
Break points won·Clear edge
8
29
Deciding sets·Even
33
35
Tiebreaks·Dominant
27
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.[7]
Ito T.[5]
7-655-76-4
Semi-finals
Ito T.[5]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-22-0
Muller G.[7]
Lacko L.[1]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Muller G.[7]
Groth S.[4]
6-36-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Ram R.[2]
6-27-5
Ito T.[5]
Saville L.
6-27-63
Lacko L.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-26-4
R16
Ram R.[2]
Krajicek A.
7-54-67-5
Lacko L.[1]
Bolt A.
7-56-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-16-2
Weintraub A.
Grigelis L.
7-56-1
Groth S.[4]
Jung J.
5-77-656-4
Muller G.[7]
Chen T.
7-56-3
Ito T.[5]
Smethurst D.
6-37-5
Saville L.
Soeda G.[3]
7-624-66-2
R32
Weintraub A.
Moriya H.[8]
6-26-1
Lacko L.[1]
Millman J.
6-41-66-3
Muller G.[7]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-4
Ito T.[5]
Reid M.
7-57-5
Smethurst D.
Yang T.
2-67-56-3
Soeda G.[3]
Chung H.
6-36-4
Chiudinelli M.
Mitchell B.
6-26-4
Grigelis L.
Smith J.
3-66-46-3
Groth S.[4]
Chung H.
4-66-17-66
Chen T.
Kravchuk K.
1-66-27-61
Saville L.
Kim Y.
6-16-2
Sugita Y.[6]
De Voest R.
6-26-4
Krajicek A.
Lim Y.
6-44-66-4
Bolt A.
Kutrovsky D.
2-66-36-4
Jung J.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Ram R.[2]
Wolmarans F.
6-746-36-4