Rajeev Ram vs Austin Krajicek — Gimcheon CH Round of 16

Gimcheon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA2
Rajeev Ram
42 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2014
hard
USA
Austin Krajicek
36 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWW
Ram R.
7-5 4-6 7-5
Krajicek A.
Ram R.
7472
Krajicek A.
5651

Rajeev Ram defeated Austin Krajicek 7-5 4-6 7-5 in the Gimcheon CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Austin Krajicek came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Rajeev Ram claimed a first win over Austin Krajicek in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-04ChennaiR32hardAustin Krajicek6-7(0) 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ram R.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Krajicek A.

Krajicek A.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Ram R.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ram R.Krajicek A.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Even
66%
65%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
64%
62%
Aces / match·Even
7.2
7.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (157 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ram R.Krajicek A.
Clutch Rating·Even
31
31
Break points saved·Slight edge
85
76
Break points won·Slight edge
9
3
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
52
Tiebreaks·Dominant
85
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.[7]
Ito T.[5]
7-655-76-4
Semi-finals
Ito T.[5]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-22-0
Muller G.[7]
Lacko L.[1]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Muller G.[7]
Groth S.[4]
6-36-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Ram R.[2]
6-27-5
Ito T.[5]
Saville L.
6-27-63
Lacko L.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-26-4
R16
Ram R.[2]
Krajicek A.
7-54-67-5
Lacko L.[1]
Bolt A.
7-56-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-16-2
Weintraub A.
Grigelis L.
7-56-1
Groth S.[4]
Jung J.
5-77-656-4
Muller G.[7]
Chen T.
7-56-3
Ito T.[5]
Smethurst D.
6-37-5
Saville L.
Soeda G.[3]
7-624-66-2
R32
Weintraub A.
Moriya H.[8]
6-26-1
Lacko L.[1]
Millman J.
6-41-66-3
Muller G.[7]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-4
Ito T.[5]
Reid M.
7-57-5
Smethurst D.
Yang T.
2-67-56-3
Soeda G.[3]
Chung H.
6-36-4
Chiudinelli M.
Mitchell B.
6-26-4
Grigelis L.
Smith J.
3-66-46-3
Groth S.[4]
Chung H.
4-66-17-66
Chen T.
Kravchuk K.
1-66-27-61
Saville L.
Kim Y.
6-16-2
Sugita Y.[6]
De Voest R.
6-26-4
Krajicek A.
Lim Y.
6-44-66-4
Bolt A.
Kutrovsky D.
2-66-36-4
Jung J.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Ram R.[2]
Wolmarans F.
6-746-36-4