Tatsuma Ito vs Matt Reid — Gimcheon CH Round of 32

Gimcheon CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN5
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2014
hard
AUS
Matt Reid
35 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Ito T.
7-5 7-5
Reid M.
Ito T.
772
Reid M.
550

Tatsuma Ito defeated Matt Reid 7-5 7-5 in the Gimcheon CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-06-08s HertogenboschQ2grassTatsuma Ito6-1 7-6(1)

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Reid M.

Reid M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Ito T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Reid M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
38%
33%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
8.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 96). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Reid M.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
22
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
72
Break points won·Clear edge
9
26
Deciding sets·Dominant
43
14
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.[7]
Ito T.[5]
7-655-76-4
Semi-finals
Ito T.[5]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-22-0
Muller G.[7]
Lacko L.[1]
7-56-3
Quarter-finals
Muller G.[7]
Groth S.[4]
6-36-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Ram R.[2]
6-27-5
Ito T.[5]
Saville L.
6-27-63
Lacko L.[1]
Weintraub A.
6-26-4
R16
Ram R.[2]
Krajicek A.
7-54-67-5
Lacko L.[1]
Bolt A.
7-56-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Chiudinelli M.
6-16-2
Weintraub A.
Grigelis L.
7-56-1
Groth S.[4]
Jung J.
5-77-656-4
Muller G.[7]
Chen T.
7-56-3
Ito T.[5]
Smethurst D.
6-37-5
Saville L.
Soeda G.[3]
7-624-66-2
R32
Weintraub A.
Moriya H.[8]
6-26-1
Lacko L.[1]
Millman J.
6-41-66-3
Muller G.[7]
Kudryavtsev A.
6-16-756-4
Ito T.[5]
Reid M.
7-57-5
Smethurst D.
Yang T.
2-67-56-3
Soeda G.[3]
Chung H.
6-36-4
Chiudinelli M.
Mitchell B.
6-26-4
Grigelis L.
Smith J.
3-66-46-3
Groth S.[4]
Chung H.
4-66-17-66
Chen T.
Kravchuk K.
1-66-27-61
Saville L.
Kim Y.
6-16-2
Sugita Y.[6]
De Voest R.
6-26-4
Krajicek A.
Lim Y.
6-44-66-4
Bolt A.
Kutrovsky D.
2-66-36-4
Jung J.
Neuchrist M.
6-47-64
Ram R.[2]
Wolmarans F.
6-746-36-4