Julian Reister vs Marco Cecchinato — Rome CH Semi-final

Rome CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
GER6
Julian Reister
40 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWLLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 May 2014
clay
Marco Cecchinato
ITA
Marco Cecchinato
#175ATP
1576ELO
1546Clay ELO
$167kYTD
$5.3MCAREER
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLL
Reister J.
6-2 2-6 6-4
Cecchinato M.
Reister J.
6262
Cecchinato M.
2641

Julian Reister defeated Marco Cecchinato 6-2 2-6 6-4 in the Rome CH semi-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Julian Reister closed it out in three sets, 6–2 2–6 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Reister J.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Cecchinato M.

Cecchinato M.serving61% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Reister J.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Reister J.Cecchinato M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
74%
63%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
67%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
52%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
43%
39%
Break points saved·Even
59%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.6
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
2.9
2.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (51 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Reister J.Cecchinato M.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
25
42
Break points saved·Clear edge
66
89
Break points won·Clear edge
33
20
Deciding sets·Clear edge
20
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
46
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Reister J.Cecchinato M.
Freshness·
—
66

Cecchinato M.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 54 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Reister J.[6]
Cuevas P.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Reister J.[6]
Cecchinato M.
6-22-66-4
Cuevas P.
Volandri F.[2]
6-36-1
Quarter-finals
Cecchinato M.
Giustino L.
6-22-66-4
Cuevas P.
Daniel T.
6-24-66-4
Volandri F.[2]
Mecir Jr M.
4-66-16-1
Reister J.[6]
Gonzalez M.
6-34-66-2
R16
Volandri F.[2]
Berankis R.
7-655-76-3
Gonzalez M.
Gombos N.
6-36-4
Reister J.[6]
Delic M.
6-16-2
Cecchinato M.
Ouahab L.
6-43-66-3
Giustino L.
Jaziri M.[5]
6-26-3
Daniel T.
Starace P.[8]
6-16-4
Cuevas P.
Donati M.
6-26-4
Mecir Jr M.
Arnaboldi A.
6-43-66-2
R32
Cecchinato M.
Huta Galung J.
6-13-66-1
Donati M.
Albot R.
6-36-1
Gonzalez M.
Lajovic D.[1]
6-26-3
Gombos N.
Giannessi A.
7-626-2
Delic M.
Mesaros K.
7-626-2
Reister J.[6]
Cipolla F.
6-26-4
Ouahab L.
Haider Maurer A.[4]
4-67-56-2
Giustino L.
Fabbiano T.
6-46-3
Jaziri M.[5]
Lobkov A.
6-36-4
Starace P.[8]
Caruso S.
6-46-4
Daniel T.
Quinzi G.
7-53-66-4
Cuevas P.
Lorenzi P.[3]
6-21-66-4
Mecir Jr M.
Evans D.[7]
4-66-16-1
Arnaboldi A.
Diez S.
6-16-0
Berankis R.
Trevisan M.
6-36-0
Volandri F.[2]
Dubarenco M.
6-16-3