Tatsuma Ito vs Amir Weintraub — Taipei CH Quarter-final

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
JPN6
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2014
hard
ISR
Amir Weintraub
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ito T.
1-6 6-3 6-1
Weintraub A.
Ito T.
1662
Weintraub A.
6311

Tatsuma Ito defeated Amir Weintraub 1-6 6-3 6-1 in the Taipei CH quarter-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Amir Weintraub came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Tatsuma Ito had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 6 on hard. Tatsuma Ito claimed a first win over Amir Weintraub in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-09-14Davis Cup WG PO: JPN vs ISRRRhardAmir Weintraub6-3 6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Weintraub A.

Weintraub A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve advantage — Ito T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Weintraub A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
49%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
59%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 86). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Weintraub A.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
24
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
45
Break points won·Clear edge
9
29
Deciding sets·Slight edge
43
35
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
48
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.
Smith J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Smith J.
Ito T.[6]
1-67-636-4
Muller G.
Soeda G.[4]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[6]
Weintraub A.
1-66-36-1
Smith J.
Moriya H.[8]
6-36-2
Soeda G.[4]
Wang J.[7]
6-37-68
Muller G.
Lacko L.[2]
6-43-66-4
R16
Lacko L.[2]
Matsui T.
6-46-3
Moriya H.[8]
Saville L.
3-66-26-3
Weintraub A.
Huang L.
6-46-1
Ito T.[6]
Yang T.
6-44-66-2
Smith J.
Chen T.
6-37-62
Wang J.[7]
Krajicek A.
7-646-0
Soeda G.[4]
Jung J.
7-626-2
Muller G.
Sekiguchi S.
7-57-60
R32
Muller G.
Groth S.[5]
7-617-68
Huang L.
Hu H.
6-16-3
Weintraub A.
Chuang T.
6-36-2
Yang T.
Beck K.
4-67-617-5
Ito T.[6]
Peng H.
6-16-3
Chen T.
Ram R.[3]
6-747-656-1
Smith J.
Wang C.
6-47-5
Saville L.
Guccione C.
6-46-1
Moriya H.[8]
Mott B.
6-47-65
Wang J.[7]
Yu C.
5-76-26-1
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-36-4
Jung J.
Yang S.
6-16-1
Soeda G.[4]
Hung J.
6-46-4
Sekiguchi S.
Millman J.
6-16-3
Matsui T.
Tang C.
6-06-4
Lacko L.[2]
Wu D.
6-36-2