Gilles Muller vs Sam Groth — Taipei CH Round of 32

Taipei CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
LUX
Gilles Muller
43 yrs · 193 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2014
hard
AUS5
Sam Groth
38 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLWL
Muller G.
7-6 7-6
Groth S.
Muller G.
777102
Groth S.
61680

Gilles Muller defeated Sam Groth 7-6 7-6 in the Taipei CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Gilles Muller came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Gilles Muller extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2015-01-11SydneyR32hardGilles Muller3-6 6-3 7-6(6)

Serve vs return

This season
Muller G.serving96% hold

wins 76% of points on serve vs Groth S.

Groth S.serving95% hold

wins 75% of points on serve vs Muller G.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Muller G.Groth S.
1st serve in·Even
61%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
80%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
69%
68%
Return points won·Even
32%
32%
Break points saved·Even
69%
66%
Aces / match·Even
14.4
14.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
4.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Muller G.Groth S.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
28
Break points saved·Slight edge
97
89
Break points won·Even
4
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
87
31

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.
Smith J.
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Smith J.
Ito T.[6]
1-67-636-4
Muller G.
Soeda G.[4]
6-26-4
Quarter-finals
Ito T.[6]
Weintraub A.
1-66-36-1
Smith J.
Moriya H.[8]
6-36-2
Soeda G.[4]
Wang J.[7]
6-37-68
Muller G.
Lacko L.[2]
6-43-66-4
R16
Lacko L.[2]
Matsui T.
6-46-3
Moriya H.[8]
Saville L.
3-66-26-3
Weintraub A.
Huang L.
6-46-1
Ito T.[6]
Yang T.
6-44-66-2
Smith J.
Chen T.
6-37-62
Wang J.[7]
Krajicek A.
7-646-0
Soeda G.[4]
Jung J.
7-626-2
Muller G.
Sekiguchi S.
7-57-60
R32
Muller G.
Groth S.[5]
7-617-68
Huang L.
Hu H.
6-16-3
Weintraub A.
Chuang T.
6-36-2
Yang T.
Beck K.
4-67-617-5
Ito T.[6]
Peng H.
6-16-3
Chen T.
Ram R.[3]
6-747-656-1
Smith J.
Wang C.
6-47-5
Saville L.
Guccione C.
6-46-1
Moriya H.[8]
Mott B.
6-47-65
Wang J.[7]
Yu C.
5-76-26-1
Krajicek A.
Chiudinelli M.
3-66-36-4
Jung J.
Yang S.
6-16-1
Soeda G.[4]
Hung J.
6-46-4
Sekiguchi S.
Millman J.
6-16-3
Matsui T.
Tang C.
6-06-4
Lacko L.[2]
Wu D.
6-36-2