Facundo Bagnis vs Emilio Gomez — Cali CH Round of 32

Cali CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG4
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 28 April 2014
clay
ECU
Emilio Gomez
34 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLWLLW
Bagnis F.
6-4 6-2
Gomez E.
Bagnis F.
662
Gomez E.
420

Facundo Bagnis defeated Emilio Gomez 6-4 6-2 in the Cali CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Emilio Gomez came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, but Facundo Bagnis had been the form player, winning 6 of their last 9 on clay. Facundo Bagnis claimed a first win over Emilio Gomez in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-10-04Indian Wells MastersR128hardEmilio Gomez6-3 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Gomez E.

Gomez E.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Gomez E.
1st serve in·Even
63%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
61%
Return points won·Even
40%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.5
3.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Gomez E.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
54
32
Break points saved·Clear edge
92
77
Break points won·Clear edge
35
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
89
23
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
79

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Lama G.
Trungelliti M.
6-34-66-3
Semi-finals
Trungelliti M.
Bagnis F.[4]
7-677-65
Lama G.
De Greef A.
6-36-3
Quarter-finals
Trungelliti M.
Lorenzi P.[1]
7-657-64
De Greef A.
Duckworth J.[3]
6-46-4
Lama G.
Sabry S.
6-36-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Souto D.[8]
6-46-3
R16
Bagnis F.[4]
Barrientos N.
6-26-3
Trungelliti M.
Leite W.
6-06-2
Lorenzi P.[1]
Angelinos T.
6-26-2
Souto D.[8]
Reuter Y.
6-43-67-65
De Greef A.
Salamanca C.
2-66-26-3
Duckworth J.[3]
Pereira J.
6-36-2
Sabry S.
Struvay E.
7-54-66-3
Lama G.
Estrella V.[2]
6-46-1
R32
De Greef A.
Odesnik W.[5]
3-67-653-0
Struvay E.
Safwat M.[7]
6-34-1
Reuter Y.
Escobar G.
6-46-0
Trungelliti M.
Pouille L.[6]
7-633-67-65
Lorenzi P.[1]
Schwank E.
6-36-3
Angelinos T.
Novak D.
6-26-1
Leite W.
Quintero M.
6-41-66-4
Bagnis F.[4]
Gomez E.
6-46-2
Barrientos N.
Hernandez J.
7-56-1
Souto D.[8]
Lapentti G.
6-36-4
Salamanca C.
Semrajc J.
6-43-67-5
Pereira J.
Galdos S.
6-11-66-3
Duckworth J.[3]
Endara I.
6-37-62
Sabry S.
Makiguchi R.
6-37-5
Lama G.
Bourgue M.
6-46-4
Estrella V.[2]
Spir J.
6-26-4