Tatsuma Ito vs Konstantin Kravchuk — Shenzhen CH Round of 32

Shenzhen CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
JPN5
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 April 2014
hard
RUS
Konstantin Kravchuk
41 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWLWW
Ito T.
6-4 6-4
Kravchuk K.
Ito T.
662
Kravchuk K.
440

Tatsuma Ito defeated Konstantin Kravchuk 6-4 6-4 in the Shenzhen CH round of 32 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tatsuma Ito extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tatsuma Ito edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-10-15MoscowR16hardTatsuma Ito7-6(7) 2-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ito T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Kravchuk K.

Kravchuk K.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ito T.Kravchuk K.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
62%
65%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Even
59%
63%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.8
6.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.0
1.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ito T.Kravchuk K.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
23
Break points saved·Clear edge
61
78
Break points won·Even
9
8
Deciding sets·Slight edge
43
36
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Muller G.
Lacko L.[2]
7-646-3
Semi-finals
Lacko L.[2]
Moriya H.[8]
6-13-66-2
Muller G.
Lu Y.[1]
7-6116-4
Quarter-finals
Muller G.
Zhang Z.
6-17-5
Lu Y.[1]
Ito T.[5]
6-37-5
Moriya H.[8]
Chiudinelli M.
7-54-66-4
Lacko L.[2]
Reid M.
7-56-4
R16
Lu Y.[1]
Myneni S.
6-27-5
Ito T.[5]
Puetz T.
6-46-0
Zhang Z.
Uchiyama Y.
6-16-3
Moriya H.[8]
Yang T.
6-36-1
Chiudinelli M.
Meffert D.
6-16-2
Muller G.
Cox D.
6-36-4
Reid M.
Weintraub A.
7-656-4
Lacko L.[2]
Mektic N.
6-47-66
R32
Puetz T.
Wang C.
6-06-3
Ito T.[5]
Kravchuk K.
6-46-4
Uchiyama Y.
Sekiguchi S.
7-57-64
Zhang Z.
Zemlja G.[7]
6-16-1
Chiudinelli M.
Kudryavtsev A.
7-56-4
Meffert D.
Groth S.[4]
6-46-4
Weintraub A.
Sugita Y.[6]
6-16-2
Mektic N.
Huang L.
6-43-66-1
Lacko L.[2]
Wu D.
6-7106-16-4
Yang T.
Grigelis L.
4-67-636-4
Lu Y.[1]
Gong M.
6-26-0
Myneni S.
Jung J.
6-36-2
Muller G.
Soeda G.[3]
6-37-5
Cox D.
Gao X.
6-06-3
Moriya H.[8]
Ouyang B.
6-46-4
Reid M.
Saville L.
6-47-67