Caroline Garcia vs Sloane StephensFed Cup WG PO: USA vs FRA Round Robin

Fed Cup WG PO: USA vs FRA · WTA · Round Robin
#780WTA
32 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLWLWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Saturday, 19 April 2014
hard
#317WTA
1683ELO
1630Hard ELO
33 yrs · 170 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLLLLWL
Garcia C.
6-3 6-2
Stephens S.
Garcia C.
662
Stephens S.
320

Caroline Garcia defeated Sloane Stephens 6-3 6-2 in the Fed Cup WG PO: USA vs FRA round robin on hard. Caroline Garcia extended the head-to-head to 5–4.

Key context

Head to head

44
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-15RouenSFclaySloane Stephens6-3 6-2
2023-09-11San DiegoR16hardCaroline Garcia6-3 3-6 6-1
2023-08-14CincinnatiR32hardSloane Stephens4-6 6-4 6-4
2022-10-17Guadalajara 2R16hardSloane Stephens7-6(6) 7-5
2021-08-16CincinnatiR64hardCaroline Garcia7-6(7) 4-6 6-4
2020-08-24CincinnatiR64hardCaroline Garcia6-3 7-6(4)
2018-05-14RomeR16clayCaroline Garcia6-1 7-6(7)
2014-06-16EastbourneR32grassSloane Stephens6-2 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Garcia C.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Stephens S.

Stephens S.serving79% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Garcia C.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
70%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
71%
60%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
62%
56%
Return points won·Even
39%
43%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
6.6
1.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.1
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
72
63
Break points saved·Clear edge
91
78
Break points won·Dominant
50
90
Deciding sets·Dominant
93
55
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
82
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About