Jack Sock vs Marton Fucsovics — Miami Masters Qualifying Round 1

Miami Masters · ATP · Qualifying Round 1
USA13
Jack Sock
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Wednesday, 19 March 2014
hard
Marton Fucsovics
HUN
Marton Fucsovics
#78ATP
1756ELO
1719Hard ELO
$550kYTD
$8.7MCAREER
34 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLLLL
Sock J.
6-4 6-2
Fucsovics M.
Sock J.
662
Fucsovics M.
420

Jack Sock defeated Marton Fucsovics 6-4 6-2 in the Miami Masters qualifying round 1 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sock J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Fucsovics M.

Fucsovics M.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Sock J.

Serve advantage — Fucsovics M.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sock J.Fucsovics M.
—
Serve
23
—
Return
72

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sock J.Fucsovics M.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
53%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.3
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.9
3.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sock J.Fucsovics M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
67
73
Break points saved·Even
96
97
Break points won·Dominant
28
65
Deciding sets·Even
86
87
Tiebreaks·Dominant
82
47

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sock J.Fucsovics M.
Freshness·
—
92

Fucsovics M.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
24°CPartly cloudy
Wind 9 km/hHumidity 63%
Q2
Thiem D.[12]
Polansky P.
6-37-5
Golubev A.[1]
Dzumhur D.
6-46-2
Goffin D.[9]
Struff J.[14]
2-66-46-1
Lacko L.[15]
Lajovic D.[7]
6-36-2
Sock J.[13]
Estrella V.[10]
6-36-4
Jaziri M.[24]
Becker B.[5]
3-66-36-2
Johnson S.
Kuznetsov A.
6-36-3
Wang J.
Evans D.
6-46-2
Bogomolov Jr A.[6]
Krajinovic F.
6-16-1
Bedene A.[23]
Kamke T.[8]
6-31-66-4
Mathieu P.
Bemelmans R.
6-36-756-1
De Bakker T.
Donskoy E.[22]
7-647-65
Q1
Mathieu P.
Huta Galung J.[21]
6-44-66-4
Sock J.[13]
Fucsovics M.
6-46-2
Goffin D.[9]
Ymer E.
6-46-1
Lajovic D.[7]
Berankis R.
6-26-3
Estrella V.[10]
Baughman D.
6-16-3
Polansky P.
Gojowczyk P.[19]
0-66-27-5
Evans D.
Smyczek T.[16]
6-46-2
Dzumhur D.
Kudla D.[17]
6-36-4
Johnson S.
Russell M.[18]
7-636-4
Lacko L.[15]
Martin A.
6-36-2
Thiem D.[12]
Williams R.
7-616-1
Bogomolov Jr A.[6]
Ito T.
6-26-1
Donskoy E.[22]
Soeda G.
6-36-4
Kamke T.[8]
Daniel T.
7-646-0
Golubev A.[1]
Copil M.
6-47-63
De Bakker T.
Devvarman S.[2]
7-646-1
Jaziri M.[24]
Schwartzman D.
6-27-65
Bedene A.[23]
Odesnik W.
6-47-5
Struff J.[14]
Marchenko I.
7-646-3
Becker B.[5]
Herbert P.
6-26-2
Bemelmans R.
Bellucci T.[4]
4-66-34-2
Wang J.
Nedovyesov A.[3]
6-13-3
Kuznetsov A.
Lorenzi P.[11]
6-46-1
Krajinovic F.
Reister J.[20]
6-46-3