Fabio Fognini vs Nicolas AlmagroVina del Mar Semi-final

Vina del Mar · ATP · Semi-final
39 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 3 February 2014
clay
40 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Fognini F.
6-4 1-6 7-6
Almagro N.
Fognini F.
61772
Almagro N.
46651

Fabio Fognini defeated Nicolas Almagro 6-4 1-6 7-6 in the Vina del Mar semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Nicolas Almagro came in leading the head-to-head 4–2, but Fabio Fognini had been the form player, winning 1 of their last 6 on clay. Fabio Fognini narrowed the head-to-head to 4–3.

Key context

  • Match story: Fabio Fognini closed it out in three sets, 6–4 1–6 7–6.

Head to head

24
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2013-10-21ValenciaQFhardNicolas Almagro7-6(6) 6-2
2013-07-15HamburgSFclayFabio Fognini6-4 7-6(1)
2009-09-21BucharestR16clayFabio Fognini6-4 7-6(3)
2009-01-19Australian OpenR64hardNicolas Almagro6-2 7-5 6-0
2008-02-11Costa Do SauipeSFhardNicolas Almagro6-1 6-1
2007-04-23BarcelonaR64clayNicolas Almagro6-3 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Fognini F.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Almagro N.

Almagro N.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Fognini F.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Even
59%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
65%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.1
8.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.8
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 158). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Dominant
87
53
Break points saved·Even
93
91
Break points won·Dominant
81
23
Deciding sets·Clear edge
93
71
Tiebreaks·Dominant
92
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About