Richard Gasquet vs Nick Kyrgios — Davis Cup WG R1: FRA vs AUS Round Robin
Davis Cup WG R1: FRA vs AUS · ATP · Round Robin
3 — 0
Sets
Friday, 31 January 2014
clay
Gasquet R.7-6 6-2 6-2
Kyrgios N.
Gasquet R.
77663
Kyrgios N.
63220
Richard Gasquet defeated Nick Kyrgios 7-6 6-2 6-2 in the Davis Cup WG R1: FRA vs AUS round robin on clay. The result followed the form book — Richard Gasquet came in leading the head-to-head 5–2. Richard Gasquet extended the head-to-head to 6–2.
Key context
- Match story: Richard Gasquet closed it out in three sets, 7–6 6–2 6–2.
Head to head
5–2| Date | Tournament | Round | Surface | Winner | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-01 | Tokyo | R16 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 7-6(4) 7-6(1) |
| 2016-05-23 | Roland Garros | R32 | clay | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 7-6(7) 6-2 |
| 2016-02-15 | Marseille | QF | hard | Nick Kyrgios | 6-0 6-4 |
| 2015-08-16 | Cincinnati Masters | R64 | hard | Richard Gasquet | 6-2 6-1 |
| 2015-06-29 | Wimbledon | R16 | grass | Richard Gasquet | 7-5 6-1 6-7(7) 7-6(6) |
| 2015-04-27 | Estoril | F | clay | Richard Gasquet | 6-3 6-2 |
| 2014-06-23 | Wimbledon | R64 | grass | Nick Kyrgios | 3-6 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 10-8 |
Serve vs return
This seasonServe-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks
Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About
Statistics
This season1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
66%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
72%
79%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
53%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
70%
Return points won·Slight edge
37%
32%
Break points saved·Slight edge
59%
67%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.8
16.2
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.0
3.5
Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.
Clutch
Under pressureClutch Rating·Clear edge
76
88
Break points saved·Even
97
99
Break points won·Clear edge
49
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
84
97
Tiebreaks·Even
94
98
Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About