Na Li vs Vera Zvonareva — Shenzhen Round of 32

Shenzhen · WTA · Round of 32
CHN1
Na Li
44 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 30 December 2013
hard
Vera Zvonareva
RUS1
Vera Zvonareva
1693ELO
1659Hard ELO
41 yrs · 172 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWLW
Li N.
7-5 6-3
Zvonareva V.
Li N.
762
Zvonareva V.
530

Na Li defeated Vera Zvonareva 7-5 6-3 in the Shenzhen round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Vera Zvonareva came in leading the head-to-head 4–3. Na Li narrowed the head-to-head to 4–4.

Key context

  • Match story: Na Li closed it out in two sets, 7–5 6–3.

Head to head

3–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2010-10-04BeijingSFhardVera Zvonareva6-3 6-3
2009-03-23MiamiR32hardNa Li6-4 3-6 6-2
2009-03-09Indian WellsR16hardVera Zvonareva6-4 6-4
2008-08-11OlympicsBRhardVera Zvonareva6-0 7-5
2008-02-18DohaSFhardVera Zvonareva3-6 6-3 6-3
2007-03-05Indian WellsQFhardNa Li6-4 7-5
2006-02-27DohaR32hardNa Li6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Li N.serving75% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Zvonareva V.

Zvonareva V.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Li N.

Serve advantage — Li N.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Li N.Zvonareva V.
1st serve in·Even
65%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
65%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
57%
Return points won·Even
48%
44%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.4
1.5
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.1
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (81 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Li N.Zvonareva V.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
83
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
89
79
Break points won·Even
96
94
Deciding sets·Slight edge
83
92
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
75
52

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Li N.[1]
Peng S.[5]
6-47-5
Semi-finals
Li N.[1]
Beck A.
6-16-3
Peng S.[5]
King V.
DEF
Quarter-finals
Li N.[1]
Niculescu M.
7-54-66-4
Beck A.
Mayr Achleitner P.
3-66-36-1
Peng S.[5]
Cepelova J.
6-36-2
King V.
Strycova B.
6-26-4
R16
Li N.[1]
Kichenok N.
6-16-4
Niculescu M.
Chan Y.
2-66-36-0
Mayr Achleitner P.
Koukalova K.[3]
7-626-4
Peng S.[5]
Soler Espinosa S.
6-36-3
King V.
Errani S.
2-67-676-3
Cepelova J.
Friedsam A.
6-46-1
Strycova B.
Zheng J.[7]
6-07-66
Beck A.
Golubic V.
6-35-76-3
R32
Niculescu M.
Schmiedlova A.
4-66-26-3
Koukalova K.[3]
Vekic D.[3]
6-37-5
Golubic V.
Wozniak A.
4-66-06-2
Beck A.
Tomljanovic A.
6-36-4
Peng S.[5]
Liu F.[5]
6-16-3
Strycova B.
Govortsova O.
7-56-3
King V.
Martic P.
7-54-66-3
Errani S.
Zheng S.
6-03-67-63
Li N.[1]
Zvonareva V.[1]
7-56-3
Soler Espinosa S.
Tsurenko L.
6-47-64
Kichenok N.
Babos T.
6-02-0
Zheng J.[7]
Peer S.[7]
6-06-3
Mayr Achleitner P.
Ozaki R.
6-26-1
Friedsam A.
Jovanovski B.
6-17-5
Cepelova J.
Kichenok L.
4-66-36-1
Chan Y.
Zhang S.
3-66-46-2