Sara Errani vs Jelena JankovicWTA Championships Round Robin

WTA Championships · WTA · Round Robin
39 yrs · 164 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 21 October 2013
hard
41 yrs · 177 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
Errani S.
6-4 6-4
Jankovic J.
Errani S.
662
Jankovic J.
44

Sara Errani defeated Jelena Jankovic 6-4 6-4 in the WTA Championships round robin on hard. The result followed the form book — Sara Errani came in leading the head-to-head 3–2, defending last year's round-robin. Sara Errani extended the head-to-head to 4–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Sara Errani edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

32
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-01-11SydneyR16hardSara Errani7-6(3) 7-6(8)
2015-11-02ZhuhaiRRhardJelena Jankovic6-4 7-5
2014-05-26Roland GarrosR16claySara Errani7-6(5) 6-2
2014-05-12RomeSFclaySara Errani6-3 7-5
2010-03-08Indian WellsR32hardJelena Jankovic2-6 7-6(6) 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Errani S.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Jankovic J.

Jankovic J.serving62% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Errani S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
78%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
55%
64%
2nd serve points won·Even
42%
46%
Service points won·Slight edge
52%
57%
Return points won·Even
48%
45%
Break points saved·Slight edge
49%
55%
Aces / match·Clear edge
0.3
2.9
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.1
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
36
59
Break points saved·Dominant
8
80
Break points won·Slight edge
98
91
Deciding sets·Clear edge
78
55
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
34
50

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About